Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual vs Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Kickaffe Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

19 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

15 reasons for

Jeep Wrangler III, model available from 2006.
It has 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4
Nissan

19 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 11.5 l
The fuel economy of the Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4 is quite poor compared with the Nissan. The difference at the level of 5.9 l makes the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual better choice to stay with some coins it your pocket in times of rising prices of fuel .
56

Urban consumption

6.9 > 16.2 l
The Nissan Qashqai II consumes 9.3 l less fuel in the city compared with the Jeep. The difference at the level of 57 percent will be quite significant in daily using car. Additionally, within years it will give real and noticeable cost savings. Moreover bear in mind that estimated results of the average fuel consumption can be considerably raised if you move dynamically. The difference in fuel economy of the cars selected by you is so colossal that you should consider to choose cars with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
38

Trunk capacity

438 > 141 l
The boot of the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is 211 percent larger than the Jeep Wrangler III. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual will be much more functional. The larger the trunk, the more luggage you can carry.
33

Top speed

183 > 174 km/h
The maximum velocity of the ​​Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is greater in relation to this of the Jeep Wrangler III by 5, which allows the Nissan Qashqai II to overcome faster long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 9 kilometers/hour is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,005 > 4,000 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed at which the maximum torque is reached indicates how fast an engine achieves its full performance with growth in rotational speed. The lower revolutions or the longer range at which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration is felt earlier.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 8.9 l
19

Range

982 > 612 km
15

Wheelbase

2,644 > 2,423 mm
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual has 9 % longer wheelbase when compared to Jeep Wrangler III. Consequently the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
12

Urban range

797 > 435 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,122 > 791 km
8

Maximum load capacity

542 > 515 kg
6

Length

4,380 > 4,218 mm
The Nissan Qashqai II is 162 mm longer than the Jeep. Long cars are more spacious and in most cases provide more storage space. While the Nissan Qashqai II occurs to be better for families or persons who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Jeep Wrangler III may appeal to the young as it will not cause problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
3

Number of doors

5 > 2
A way more comfortable and useful car is five-door Nissan. The two-door version of Jeep Wrangler III features little pluses, besides more attractive silhouette.
1

Model release date

2014 > 2006
Production of the older car began 8 years prior to its competitor and for this reason man may suspect that this car features significantly less modern parts .
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 5,000 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Tire profile

65 > 75 %

Jeep

15 reasons for Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

200 > 115 hp
The horsepower is a feature that most of car fans take into account at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Jeep which has by 85 more horsepower in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. Therefore the Jeep is able to reach higher speed. With more horsepower the Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4 will also give seemingly more flexiblility in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

317 > 190 Nm
The Jeep Wrangler III has 127 newton meters more torque when compared to the Nissan Qashqai II. Although a great deal of drivers do not attach importance the maximum torque when choosing a car, it shows the best how a car is speeding up. As far as these two vehicles are cars the difference is substantial thus the Jeep will provide you with better feeling of driving.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.2 > 11.3 s
The Nissan can reach the speed of 100Km/h relatively slower compared with the Jeep. The difference in the amount of 1 % is not really significant and it should not be strongly taken by you into consideration for selecting the better one of presented cars.
22

Width

1,873 > 1,800 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Jeep Wrangler III is 73 millimeters wider in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

71 > 54 l
The winner of this confrontatnion in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Jeep Wrangler III which is able to take by 31 % more petrol in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
8

Engine capacity

3,779 > 1,198 cc
Naturally the Jeep wins in the category of {engine capacity. The difference at the level of 2,581 cubic centimeters in relation to engine of the Nissan Qashqai II. It is interesting that in „mini 4x4” segment, from which the Jeep Wrangler III comes from, the average engine displacement is 2,104 cubic centimeters and the biggest engine size in this segment is 4,201 .
4

Rear track

1,572 > 1,563 mm
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
An engine in the shape of a V is a better construction of a straight engine which as far as we are concerned is {a better one. Engine of V configuration put in a car the Jeep gives more torque at lower RPM ranges because of the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor can contain high numbers of cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Smooth engine work and pleasant sound is undoubtedly to a V engine’s advantage.
1

Height

1,865 > 1,590 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater capacity of loading massive amount of luggage to it. The difference that amounts to 275 millimeters in favor of the Jeep Wrangler III is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.
1

Tire width

245 > 215 mm
0

Rim width

7 > 6 mm
0

Payload

2,215 > 1,860 kg
0

Front track

1,571 > 1,564 mm
0

Curb weight

1,709 > 1,314 kg

Cars specifications

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,199 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2014 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Code name - JK
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK