Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4

Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

21 reasons for

Jeep Wrangler III, model available from 2006.
It has 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

15 reasons for

Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV, model available from 2005.
It has 1.6 i 16V 106HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4
Jeep

21 reasons for Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

200 > 106 hp
The Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4 comes with petrol which delivers by 89 % more horsepower over the the engine of the Suzuki, transforming the car to a more sporty character. It seems to be better car to those who want to experience thrill of drive a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

317 > 145 Nm
The difference at the level of 172 Nm is really huge thanks to which the Jeep Wrangler III features much more better flexibility of the engine, it accelerates significantly faster and has better towing capacity.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.2 > 14.4 s
A small difference at the level of 3.2 s shows that the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV is the worst vehicle of these two . In the „compact SUV class, being represented by the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4, the average acceleration is 10.9 s and is by 32 % higher than this of Suzuki vehicle.
33

Top speed

174 > 160 km/h
The top speed of the Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4 is greater as compared to this of the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 9 % is small and is imperceptible in everyday use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,000 > 4,100 revolutions/minute
A wider range and a lower number of rotations at which the maximum torque is reached has an impact on an engine’s dynamism and flexibility. However, to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always worth to see a torque performance graph.
22

Width

1,873 > 1,810 mm
Distance between two sides of a car affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability during driving. The width of the Jeep Wrangler III is larger only by 3 percent than the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 and is not really important. The average for the „small off-road 4x4” segment equals to around 1,797 mm and is by 4 percent smaller than the same feature of the Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4.
19

Fuel tank

71 > 55 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Jeep that can comprise 16 liters more fuel in relation to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV. The medium fuel container capacity in the small off-road 4x4 class, from which the Jeep Wrangler III comes from, amounts to 61 liters, whereas in compact SUV class (represented by the Suzuki Grand Vitara II) it equals 61 l.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
11

Extra-urban range

791 > 775 km
8

Engine capacity

3,779 > 1,587 cc
The Jeep Wrangler III has 2,192 cc greater engine capacity in comparison to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II. Such a big difference makes that comparision of this characteristics is pointless. The Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 seems to be the good choice for drivers who apreciate lower fuel consumption and running costs at the expense of car’s performance, however, those who decided to buy the Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4 should benefit from better power, flexibility, culture of the engine and as a result better joy when driving.
8

Maximum load capacity

515 > 425 kg
4

Rear track

1,572 > 1,570 mm
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A Vee engine is a improved version of a engine with all cylinders aligned in one row which in our opinion} is with more adventages. Engine of V type installed in a the Jeep Wrangler III gives more torque at lower RPM ranges because of the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime may house high numbers of cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Smooth engine work and pleasant sound is certainly to a Vee engine’s advantage.
1

Model release date

2006 > 2005
The difference in date of commencement of production between presented vehicles is only 1 year, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a fast pace and for that reason the Jeep Wrangler III may feature more modern solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
1

Height

1,865 > 1,695 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Jeep Wrangler III, which is by 10 % higher than the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV, is better pick for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
1

Tire width

245 > 225 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 5,900 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,215 > 1,828 kg
0

Front track

1,571 > 1,540 mm
0

Rear overhang

1,000 > 1,074 mm
0

Curb weight

1,709 > 1,405 kg

Suzuki

15 reasons for Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

8.3 > 11.5 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Suzuki Grand Vitara II's advantage. This vehicle consumes 3.2 l less fuel in the combined cycle when compared with the Jeep. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the compact SUV segment, in which the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 is classified, equals to 7.5 l whereas the Suzuki needs by 11 percent more fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

10.2 > 16.2 l
The Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 burns up of 37 percent gasoline less while driving inside city in relation to the Jeep Wrangler III. The Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV, as a representative of small off-road 4x4 class, uses of 0.6 l per 100 km more than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “mini 4x4” segment is 9.6 l/100Km.
38

Trunk capacity

186 > 141 l
The Suzuki Grand Vitara II features 45 l larger trunk in relation to the Jeep. Such a difference is quite big therefore it will distinctly matters in terms of the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. At the same time that the Suzuki has 259 l bigger trunk capacity than the average in its segment. Roomy trunk will be useful during family traveling as well as while everyday driving.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,067 > 431 l
24

Extra-urban consumption

7 > 8.9 l
19

Range

671 > 612 km
15

Wheelbase

2,636 > 2,423 mm
The wheelbase of a car means the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of better car's weight distribution. Suzuki has 213 mm longer wheelbase distance than Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
12

Urban range

539 > 435 km
6

Length

4,467 > 4,218 mm
The Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV is 249 mm longer when compared to the Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4. The length of the vehicle is significant when it comes to driving comfort and space in the boot. The Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 preasumbly will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 will be better driven ,however, the Jeep Wrangler III will be a bit easier for parking because of shorter length .
3

Number of doors

5 > 2
Much more comfortable and useful car is five-door Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4. The 2-door version of Jeep Wrangler III offers little pluses, except for more aggressive look.
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Front overhang

753 > 805 mm
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Tire profile

70 > 75 %

Cars specifications

Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4 Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2006 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Code name JK -
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK