The Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4 comes with petrol which delivers by 89 % more horsepower over the the engine of the Suzuki, transforming the car to a more sporty character. It seems to be better car to those who want to experience thrill of drive a sports car.
The difference at the level of 172 Nm is really huge thanks to which the Jeep Wrangler III features much more better flexibility of the engine, it accelerates significantly faster and has better towing capacity.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
A small difference at the level of 3.2 s shows that the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV is the worst vehicle of these two . In the „compact SUV class, being represented by the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4, the average acceleration is 10.9 s and is by 32 % higher than this of Suzuki vehicle.
The top speed of the Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4 is greater as compared to this of the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 9 % is small and is imperceptible in everyday use.
Maximal torque RPM
A wider range and a lower number of rotations at which the maximum torque is reached has an impact on an engine’s dynamism and flexibility. However, to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always worth to see a torque performance graph.
Distance between two sides of a car affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability during driving. The width of the Jeep Wrangler III is larger only by 3 percent than the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 and is not really important. The average for the „small off-road 4x4” segment equals to around 1,797 mm and is by 4 percent smaller than the same feature of the Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4.
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Jeep that can comprise 16 liters more fuel in relation to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV. The medium fuel container capacity in the small off-road 4x4 class, from which the Jeep Wrangler III comes from, amounts to 61 liters, whereas in compact SUV class (represented by the Suzuki Grand Vitara II) it equals 61 l.
The Jeep Wrangler III has 2,192 cc greater engine capacity in comparison to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II. Such a big difference makes that comparision of this characteristics is pointless. The Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 seems to be the good choice for drivers who apreciate lower fuel consumption and running costs at the expense of car’s performance, however, those who decided to buy the Jeep Wrangler III 3.8 i V6 12V 200HP manual 4x4 should benefit from better power, flexibility, culture of the engine and as a result better joy when driving.
Maximum load capacity
A Vee engine is a
improved version of a
engine with all cylinders aligned in one row
which in our opinion} is
adventages. Engine of V type
installed in a the Jeep Wrangler III
gives more torque at lower RPM ranges because of
the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of
engime may house high numbers of
cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A
Smooth engine work and pleasant sound is
certainly to a Vee
Model release date
The difference in date of commencement of production between presented vehicles is only 1 year, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a fast pace and for that reason the Jeep Wrangler III may feature more modern solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Jeep Wrangler III, which is by 10 % higher than the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV, is better pick for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.