Kia Cerato Sedan 1.6 CRDi 115HP vs Seat Toledo IV 1.2 75HP manual

Kia Cerato Sedan 1.6 CRDi 115HP

Source: Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

13 reasons for

Kia Cerato Sedan, model available from 2004.
It has 1.6 CRDi 115HP diesel engine produced from 2004.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

5 reasons for

Seat Toledo IV, model available from 2012.
It has 1.2 75HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Seat Toledo IV 1.2 75HP manual

13 reasons for Kia Cerato Sedan 1.6 CRDi 115KM in comparison to Seat Toledo IV 1.2 75HP manual

Reasons for

Maximal power

115 > 75 hp
The Kia Cerato Sedan comes with diesel which delivers by 40 more horsepower than the the engine of the Seat Toledo IV, transforming the car to a much more dynamic character. It should be better choice for drivers who want to feel thrill of drive a sports car.

Maximal torque

236 > 112 Nm
The difference at the level of 124 Nm is really substantial. It stems from the fact that both vehicles have various types of engine. While the Kia Cerato Sedan has a diesel engine, the Seat has a petrol engine.

Maximal torque RPM

1,995 > 3,750 revolutions/minute
A wider range and a lower value of rotations at which the highest torque is reached has an impact on an engine’s performance. Still, to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is always worth to check a torque graph.


1,735 > 1,701 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Kia Cerato is 2 % wider in comparison to the Seat. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.


2,611 > 2,608 mm
Kia Cerato Sedan has 3 mm longer wheelbase than the Seat Toledo IV. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.


4 > 3

Engine capacity

1,581 > 1,199 cc
The Kia Cerato Sedan has 382 cubic centimeters bigger cubic capacity than the Seat Toledo IV. The difference is substantia. Consequently the Kia should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine size affects worst fuel consumption.


4,504 > 4,480 mm
The Kia is 1 percent longer in relation to the Seat Toledo IV. The length of the vehicle is important in terms of travelling comfort and room in the trunk. The Kia Cerato very likely will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Kia Cerato Sedan will be better driven but the Seat will be a slightly easier for parking because of shorter length .


1,472 > 1,459 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of putting massive amount of stuff to it. The difference of 1 % to the advantage of the Kia Cerato is insignificant and does not matter much.

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 5,400 revolutions/minute

Front track

1,495 > 1,466 mm


16 > 12

Rear overhang

977 > 1,003 mm


5 reasons for Seat Toledo IV 1.2 75KM manual in comparison to Kia Cerato Sedan 1.6 CRDi 115HP

Reasons for

Trunk capacity

549 > 346 l
With more trunk space the Seat Toledo IV will have much more room for loading things and be more usefull vehicle than the Kia. If the size of the trunk is what does appeal to you, the Seat Toledo IV will be better choice as it is about 203 liters more spacious than the trunk of its competitor.

Fuel tank

55 > 54 l
The winner of this comparison in the category of fuel tank capacity is Seat Toledo IV which can take by 1 l more gasoline in relation to the Kia Cerato Sedan.

Rear track

1,500 > 1,482 mm

Model release date

2012 > 2004
Manufacture of the older vehicle commenced much more earlier than Kia hence we may expect that this car has not so modern technologies used.

Front overhang

865 > 913 mm

Cars specifications

Kia Cerato Sedan 1.6 CRDi 115HP Seat Toledo IV 1.2 75HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 745 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2004 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK