The horsepower is a something that most of us take into account at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Mazda 6 III Estate 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175HP manual that has by 59 more horsepower than the Kia. Therefore the Mazda 6 III is able to reach higher speed. Due to more horsepower the Mazda 6 III Estate should as well give noticeably more flexiblility in specific speeds.
As opposed to the Kia, the fuel economy of Mazda 6 III looks really attractive. The Mazda 6 III Estate uses 5.1 liters of fuel for every 100 km fewer in relation to the Kia Clarus II Estate 1.8 i 16V 116HP manual.
The difference of 266 newton meters is really large. It results from the fact that these vehicles are equipped with different types of engine. Whereas the Mazda is equipped with a diesel engine, the Kia has a petrol engine.
The Mazda 6 III Estate burns up of 55 % fuel less running around the town in comparison to the Kia. The Mazda, which is classified in large family cars segment, uses 5.1 l per 100 km less than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “large family cars” class equals to 10.6 l/100Km.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Mazda 6 III accelerates to 100k\h
compared to the Kia Clarus II Estate. A noticable difference in
acceleration in favor of the Mazda 6 III Estate 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175HP manual will allow him to overtake much
faster and avoid other obstacles.
With more trunk space the Mazda will have much more room for carrying things and be more functional vehicle compared with the Kia. If the size of the luggage compartment is appeals to you, the Mazda will be better to buy because it is around 66 % larger than the boot of its rival.
Trunk capacity with seats down
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the Mazda 6 III is greater in comparison to this of the Kia which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 19 % is little and is imperceptible in everyday use.
Maximal torque RPM
Such a huge difference stems from the fact that both compared vehicles have various engines. The Mazda 6 III is equipped with the diesel engine, the Kia is equipped with the petrol engine. Taking into account different kinds of engines, comparing this characteristic is pointless.
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Mazda is 4 percent wider than the Kia Clarus II. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
In this category it is the Mazda 6 III that can contain 3 liters more fuel in comparison to the Kia Clarus II Estate 1.8 i 16V 116HP manual. The medium fuel tank size in the middle segment, from which the Mazda 6 III comes from, amounts to 63 liters, whereas in large family cars segment (represented by the Kia Clarus II) it is 63 liters.
The wheelbase of a car means the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Mazda 6 III Estate has 3 percent longer wheelbase distance than Kia. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Mazda 6 III Estate 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
Number of gears
The Mazda 6 III have a higher gear count in relation to the Kia Clarus II which means
that Mazda 6 III Estate 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175HP manual would have
better speeding up and better fuel
economy. But the difference is quiet
little and if you are not drag
racer at a timed event you would not even
observe the difference.
The Mazda 6 III Estate has 399 cubic centimeters greater engine capacity in relation to the Kia Clarus II. Because the difference is not big, the Mazda 6 III Estate should accelerate a bit faster, of course if other paramerters are equal.
The Mazda 6 III is 1 percent longer when compared to the Kia Clarus II Estate. Long vehicles have more interior space and also provide more storage space. Although the Mazda 6 III Estate occurs to be better choice for families or drivers who value comfortable driving, the Kia Clarus II Estate may be more appropriate to the young as it will not make troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.