Nissan Altima III 3.5 i V6 24V 248HP manual vs Kia Optima Sedan 2.0 DOHC 165HP manual

Nissan Altima III 3.5 i V6 24V 248HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org IFCAR All Rights Released into the public domain

12 reasons for

Nissan Altima III, model available from 2002 to 2006.
It has 3.5 i V6 24V 248HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2006.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

9 reasons for

Kia Optima Sedan, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 DOHC 165HP petrol engine produced from 2013 to 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Kia Optima Sedan 2.0 DOHC 165HP manual
Nissan

12 reasons for Nissan Altima III 3.5 i V6 24V 248KM manual in comparison to Kia Optima Sedan 2.0 DOHC 165HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

248 > 165 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of drivers take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Nissan Altima III which has by 83 more horsepower in relation to the Kia. As a result the Nissan Altima III can achieve higher speed. With more horsepower the Nissan Altima III 3.5 i V6 24V 248HP manual should also give more flexiblility in specific speeds.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.1 > 9.5 s
The Nissan Altima III speeds up to 100k\h 25 percent faster than the Kia Optima Sedan. A noticable difference in acceleration in favor of the Nissan Altima III will allow him to overtake much faster and avoid other obstacles.
19

Fuel tank

75 > 69 l
The Kia Optima is worst that the Nissan Altima III in the field of fuel tank capacity. The Nissan Altima III 3.5 i V6 24V 248HP manual is able to hold by 6 l more fuel than the Kia Optima.
15

Wheelbase

2,800 > 2,796 mm
The Nissan Altima III has 4 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to Kia Optima Sedan 2.0 DOHC 165HP manual. Therefore the Nissan is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable riding.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
8

Engine capacity

3,499 > 1,998 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the Nissan is by 75 percent bigger when compared to the Kia. In a consequence the Kia will be more fuel efficient, however, the engine of the Nissan Altima III will be of better quality, running more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
6

Length

4,874 > 4,847 mm
The Nissan Altima III is 1 percent longer in relation to the Kia Optima Sedan 2.0 DOHC 165HP manual. Long cars are more spacious and usually provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Nissan Altima III occurs to be better pick for families or drivers who love the idea of convenient driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Kia may appeal to city drivers as it will not make troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A V engine is a better version of a straight engine which according to us is a better choice. Engine of V layout in a car the Nissan gives more torque at lower RPM ranges because of the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor may house high numbers of cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Smooth engine work and thrilling sound is to a V engine’s advantage.
1

Height

1,464 > 1,457 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of loading massive amount of thinks to it. The difference that amounts to 7 millimeters in favor of the Nissan Altima III is little and should not be really noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,800 > 6,500 revolutions/minute
0

Valves

24 > 16
0

Curb weight

1,459 > 1,425 kg

Kia

9 reasons for Kia Optima Sedan 2.0 DOHC 165KM manual in comparison to Nissan Altima III 3.5 i V6 24V 248HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

9.3 > 12.4 l
The Kia Optima consumes 3.1 l less gasoline in the city than the Nissan. The difference in the amount of 3.1 l is quite appreciable in everyday usage of the ride. But, in a long term it will even bring you significant savings. Keep in mind that fuel consumption may vary depending on how you drive
38

Trunk capacity

505 > 440 l
If you are looking for a vehicles by which you could set of for travels, which could hold more luggage , go for the Kia Optima. The Nissan is equiped with by 65 liters smaller trunk than the Nissan Altima III 3.5 i V6 24V 248HP manual so in this case you would be able to load a bit less. Examining the trunk also check its width length and height which have notable effect on loading possibility .
33

Top speed

210 > 200 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Kia Optima is higher in comparison to this of the Nissan Altima III 3.5 i V6 24V 248HP manual which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 10 km/h is not big and is imperceptible in daily use.
22

Width

1,834 > 1,790 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Kia Optima Sedan 2.0 DOHC 165HP manual is 2 % wider than the Nissan Altima III. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
12

Urban range

753 > 613 km
4

Rear track

1,590 > 1,555 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 4
A five-door car usually is a hatchback (however estate cars also count as 5-door cars) and for that reason the Kia Optima, where you can open up the boot lid and fold flat the back seats making more room, has the edge over the four-door Nissan Altima III 3.5 i V6 24V 248HP manual with the hinges for the boot that opens under the rear window.
1

Model release date

2011 > 2002
Production of the older vehicle commenced much more earlier than its rival hence we may expect that this car features not so advanced parts .
0

Front track

1,588 > 1,550 mm

Cars specifications

Nissan Altima III 3.5 i V6 24V 248HP manual Kia Optima Sedan 2.0 DOHC 165HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,300 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2002 2011
    Facelifting no no
    Class D D
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK