Kia Picanto II Hatchback 3d 1.0 69HP manual vs Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual

Kia Picanto II Hatchback 3d 1.0 69HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

12 reasons for

Kia Picanto II Hatchback 3d, model available from 2011.
It has 1.0 69HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d, model available from 2005.
It has 1.4 D-4D 55HP diesel engine produced from 2005 to 2011.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual
Kia

12 reasons for Kia Picanto II Hatchback 3d 1.0 69KM manual in comparison to Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

69 > 55 hp
The Kia Picanto II Hatchback 3d has by 25 percent more horsepower in comparison to Toyota. The Kia will be distinctly more dynamically accelerate thanks to grater power. Also passing other cars while driving should be a piece of cake for a car equipped with more powerful motor.
56

Urban consumption

5.4 > 5.5 l
The Kia Picanto II uses 0.1 l less in city traffic in comparison to the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual. The difference in the amount of 2 percent is not very appreciable in everyday use of the ride, however, during the term of a several months it can generate a real savings.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

15.4 > 16.8 s
The Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d speeds up relatively slower compared to the Kia Picanto II Hatchback 3d 1.0 69HP manual. The difference at the level of 8 percent is not really significant and it should not be strongly taken into as important when choosing one of these two cars.
38

Trunk capacity

202 > 139 l
The Kia Picanto II Hatchback 3d 1.0 69HP manual features 63 liters larger boot compared with the Toyota. Such a difference is significant and it will distinctly matters in terms of the comfort of the car’s usage. At the same time that the Kia Picanto II Hatchback 3d has 22 liters bigger boot size than the average in its class. Larger boot will be useful during family traveling as well as during everyday car’s usage.
15

Wheelbase

2,387 > 2,348 mm
The Kia has 2 % longer wheelbase in comparison to Toyota. As a result the Kia Picanto II Hatchback 3d is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
12

Urban range

648 > 636 km
8

Maximum load capacity

495 > 355 kg
6

Length

3,550 > 3,416 mm
The Kia Picanto II Hatchback 3d is 4 % longer than the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and in most cases provide more storage space. While the Kia seems to be better option for families or persons who value comfortable driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Toyota may appeal to the young because it will not make problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,412 > 1,407 mm
1

Model release date

2011 > 2005
Manufacture of the older vehicle began much more earlier than its contender and for this reason man may suspect that this car is equipped with not so modern solutions used.
1

Height

1,478 > 1,465 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Kia Picanto II Hatchback 3d, which is by 1 % higher than the Toyota, is appropriate pick for you. However, presented cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Payload

1,345 > 1,242 kg

Toyota

9 reasons for Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55KM manual in comparison to Kia Picanto II Hatchback 3d 1.0 69HP manual

Reasons for
33

Top speed

154 > 153 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Toyota is higher as compared to this of the Kia which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 1 percent is small and is imperceptible in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,619 > 1,595 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual is 2 percent wider than the Kia. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

36 > 34 l
The Kia Picanto II Hatchback 3d loses with the Toyota in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual is able to store by 6 percent more fuel compared with the Kia Picanto II Hatchback 3d.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Engine capacity

1,453 > 997 cc
The Toyota has 46 % bigger engine size in comparison to the Kia Picanto II. The difference is large. Consequently the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand bigger engine displacement usually equals worst fuel consumption.
0

Turning circle

4.7 > 5.1 m.
A vehicle’s turning radius determines how it is able to act in tight turns and into pint-size parking spaces. Generally speaking, the tighter a turning radius, the better it can handle small spots. The Toyota has by 0.4 m. tighter turning circle in relation to the Kia Picanto II Hatchback 3d 1.0 69HP manual. But these two cars doesn’t differ so much to be quite perceptible.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 6,200 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,414 > 1,409 mm
0

Curb weight

894 > 841 kg

Cars specifications

Kia Picanto II Hatchback 3d 1.0 69HP manual Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2011 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class A A
    Payload 1,345 kg 1,242 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK