Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4 vs Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4

Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4

Source: Thomas doerfer Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

19 reasons for

Kia Retona, model available from 1997 to 2003.
It has 2.0 i 16V 128HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2003.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Lada Niva 2131, model available from 1980.
It has 1.8 82HP petrol engine produced from 1995 to 2004.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4

19 reasons for Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4

Reasons for

Maximal power

128 > 82 hp
The Kia Retona is equipped with petrol which produce by 56 % more horsepower over the Lada Niva, giving the vehicle a more dynamic character. It seems to be better choice to those who want to feel thrill of drive a sports car.

Average consumption

10.8 > 12.5 l
The Kia Retona uses 1.7 l fewer fuel in the combined cycle in relation to the Lada Niva. The Kia Retona, being classified in „small off-road 4x4” class uses by 3.3 l more fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle is 7.5 l.

Maximal torque

176 > 139 Nm
The Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4 has 37 newton meters more torque when compared to the Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4. The difference at such level is quite big, so that the Kia Retona will be seeding up perceptibly faster.

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

15 > 22 s
If a dynamic driving is what you realy like, the Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4 will appeal to you because it’s acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is 32 percent better compared to the Lada Niva.

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,237 > 710 l

Top speed

160 > 135 km/h
The maximum velocity of the Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4 is greater in comparison to this of the Lada Niva which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 25 kilometers per hour is not big and is imperceptible in everyday use.


1,749 > 1,680 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Kia Retona is 4 percent wider than the Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.


566 > 528 km

Engine capacity

1,997 > 1,775 cc
The Kia Retona has 222 cc larger engine capacity in comparison to the Lada. For the reason that the difference is little, the Kia Retona should accelerate slightly dynamically, of course assuming that other paramerters are the same.

Rear track

1,483 > 1,400 mm

Price range

popular > cheap


1,834 > 1,640 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater capacity of loading big amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 12 percent in favor of the Kia Retona is small and does not matter much.

Model release date

1997 > 1980

Tire width

215 > 175 mm

Front track

1,483 > 1,432 mm

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2


16 > 8

Tire profile

75 > 80 %

Curb weight

1,484 > 1,369 kg


10 reasons for Łada Niva 2131 1.8 82KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4

Reasons for

Trunk capacity

265 > 231 l
The boot of the Lada Niva is only 34 l bigger than the Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4. However, the difference is not big it would be fair to say that both cars have more of less the same trunk capacity.

Maximal torque RPM

3,200 > 4,695 revolutions/minute
The RMP where the maximum torque is reached shows us how fast an engine achieves its best output with increase in revolutions. The lower rmp or the wider range in which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration should be felt earlier.

Fuel tank

66 > 59 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Lada Niva 2131 that can carry 7 liters more fuel compared with the Kia Retona. The average fuel container size in the compact SUV segment, which is represented by the Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4, amounts to 61 l, whereas in small off-road 4x4 class (represented by the Kia) it is 61 liters.


2,700 > 2,359 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4 has 341 mm longer wheelbase distance in relation to Kia. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Lada should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.

Maximum load capacity

500 > 340 kg


4,239 > 4,000 mm
The Lada Niva 2131 is 239 millimeters longer than the Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4. Long cars more of passenger space and in most cases provide more storage space. Although the Lada Niva occurs to be better choice for families or those who appreciate comfortable driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Kia Retona may be more appropriate to women as it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no question that the five-door Lada Niva is more usable and if you regularly travel with more than one passenger then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The biggest advantage of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the rear seats but it’s as well easier to place luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Kia Retona generally look more dynamic and sporty and for those who rarely have passengers in the back seat the Kia Retona may be more appropriate, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.

Maximal power RPM

5,200 > 5,400 revolutions/minute


1,872 > 1,824 kg

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″

Cars specifications

Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4 Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular cheap
    Model release date 1997 1980
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload 1,824 kg 1,872 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK