Subaru Forester I 2.0 122HP manual 4x4 vs Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4

Subaru Forester I 2.0 122HP manual 4x4

Source: All Rights Released into the public domain

14 reasons for

Subaru Forester I, model available from 1997 to 2002.
It has 2.0 122HP petrol engine produced from 1997 to 2000.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

11 reasons for

Kia Retona, model available from 1997 to 2003.
It has 2.0 i 16V 128HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2003.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4

14 reasons for Subaru Forester I 2.0 122KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4

Reasons for

Urban consumption

11.7 > 12.8 l
The Subaru Forester I uses 1.1 l fewer petrol in city traffic in relation to the Kia. The Subaru Forester I, which comes from small off-road 4x4 class, uses 2.1 l fewer gasoline. Bear in mind that average fuel consumption in the urban for the small off-road 4x4 class equals to 9.6 l, while the Subaru Forester I uses by 22 percent more fuel than the average.

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.8 > 15 s
If a dynamic driving is what you are really in to, the Subaru Forester I is better for you because it’s acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is 28 % better compared to the Kia.

Trunk capacity

404 > 231 l
With more trunk space the Subaru will have much more room for loading things and be more functional one than the Kia. If the capacity of the luggage compartment is what does appeal to you, the Subaru Forester I will be better to choose as it is about 75 % more spacious than the trunk of its rival.

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,523 > 1,237 l

Top speed

178 > 160 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the ​​Subaru Forester I is greater in comparison to the Kia by 18 km/h, which allows the Subaru to cover faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 18 kilometers per hour is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.

Fuel tank

61 > 59 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Subaru Forester I 2.0 122HP manual 4x4 which can contain 3 percent more fuel in comparison to the Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4. The medium fuel container size in the mini 4x4 segment, which is represented by the Subaru Forester I 2.0 122HP manual 4x4, is 61 liters, whereas in mini 4x4 segment (represented by the Kia Retona) it is 61 l.


2,525 > 2,359 mm
The Subaru has 166 mm longer wheelbase when compared to Kia Retona. As a result the Subaru Forester I 2.0 122HP manual 4x4 is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable riding.

Urban range

513 > 469 km

Maximum load capacity

480 > 340 kg


4,488 > 4,000 mm
The Subaru is 488 mm longer in comparison to the Kia Retona. Long vehicles have more interior space and in most cases provide more storage space. Although the Subaru Forester I seems to be better choice for families or persons who love the idea of convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Kia Retona may appeal to singles as it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.

Cylinder layout

boxer > inline
A Boxer engine placed in the Subaru Forester I occurs to be noticeably better because it has smaller dimensions and produces less vibrations in relation to straight engine. What is more bear in mind that its horizontal configuration results in that a vehicle has the benefit of a lower center of gravity what affects the better grip. The advantage of engine which cylinders are arranged in a line, like the one installed in the Kia Retona, is that thanks to its simple construction it can be fuel efficient compared to other types of engines.

Number of doors

5 > 3
It is beyond the question that the five-door Subaru is more convenient and if you frequently drive with more than one passenger then it’s the format to go for. The strongest point of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the back but it’s as well easier to place luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Kia Retona very often look much cooler and for young drivers who don’t often have passengers in the back seat the Kia Retona may be better one.


1,859 > 1,824 kg

Tire profile

70 > 75 %


11 reasons for Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Subaru Forester I 2.0 122HP manual 4x4

Reasons for

Maximal power

128 > 122 hp
The horsepower is a something that most of us pay the biggest attention to. In this case, it is the Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4 that has by 5 % horsepower more in comparison to the Subaru Forester I, which makes this car a bit better in terms of high speed. Due to more horsepower the Kia will as well give slightly better flexiblility in specific gears.


1,749 > 1,735 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Kia Retona is 14 mm wider than the Subaru Forester I. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.

Ground clearance

202 > 171 mm
Ground clearance is defined as the minimum distance between the car underbody and the ground. taking these two cars into consideration, it is the Kia which has 31 millimeters higher ride height in relation to the Subaru. This is why the Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4 will cope better when driving over imperfect roads and obstacles in the city. There is olso one minus - the higher ground clearance means a higher center of gravity, which can negatively influence the handling of the Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4.

Engine capacity

1,997 > 1,995 cc
The Kia Retona has by 2 cc greater engine size when compared to the Subaru Forester I. This may have a little impact in terms of acceleration, as both values are quite simmilar.

Rear track

1,483 > 1,477 mm


1,834 > 1,534 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater possibility of carrying massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 300 mm in favor of the Kia Retona is little and does not matter much.

Tire width

215 > 205 mm

Maximal power RPM

5,400 > 5,600 revolutions/minute

Front track

1,483 > 1,478 mm

End of model sale

2003 > 2002

Curb weight

1,484 > 1,385 kg

Cars specifications

Subaru Forester I 2.0 122HP manual 4x4 Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1997 1997
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload 1,859 kg 1,824 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK