Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4 vs Suzuki Vitara I Cabrio 1.6 16V 97HP manual 4x4

Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Thomas doerfer Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

18 reasons for

Kia Retona, model available from 1997 to 2003.
It has 2.0 i 16V 128HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2003.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

2 reasons for

Suzuki Vitara I Cabrio, model available from 1988 to 2004.
It has 1.6 16V 97HP petrol engine produced from 1991 to 2002.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki Vitara I Cabrio 1.6 16V 97HP manual 4x4
Kia

18 reasons for Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Suzuki Vitara I Cabrio 1.6 16V 97HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

128 > 97 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that most of drivers take into account at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4 that has by 31 more horsepower in relation to the Suzuki Vitara I. As a result the Kia Retona will reach higher top speed. Thanks to more horsepower the Kia will as well provide more flexiblility in specific gears.
59

Maximal torque

176 > 132 Nm
The Kia has 44 Nm more torque in comparison to the Suzuki Vitara I Cabrio 1.6 16V 97HP manual 4x4. The difference at this level is relevant, what means that the Kia will be seeding up perceptibly better.
38

Trunk capacity

231 > 117 l
The trunk of the Kia Retona is 114 l more spacious compared to the Suzuki Vitara I Cabrio. It is sensible difference so, in this category the Kia Retona will be a way more functional. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can hold.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,237 > 595 l
33

Top speed

160 > 150 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the ​​Kia Retona is greater in relation to the Suzuki Vitara I by 7, which allows the Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4 to overcome faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 10 kilometers/hour is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,749 > 1,630 mm
distance between left and right side of a vehicle directly influences on the amount of space for passengers as well as stability during driving. The Kia Retona is widther by 7 percent in relation to the Suzuki Vitara I Cabrio 1.6 16V 97HP manual 4x4 and is not really important. The medium for the „mini 4x4” class equals to 1,797 millimeters and is by 48 millimeters smaller than the same feature of the Kia Retona.
19

Fuel tank

59 > 42 l
The winner of this comparison in the aspect of fuel tank size is Kia Retona which can carry by 40 % more gasoline in relation to the Suzuki Vitara I.
15

Wheelbase

2,359 > 2,195 mm
The Kia Retona has 164 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to Suzuki. As a result the Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4 is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable riding.
9

Ground clearance

202 > 200 mm
Ground clearance is a vital factor in many important characteristics of a car. Clearance is very important in off-road cars though all cars appreciate the higher suspension. The Kia has 2 mm larger clearance when compared with the Suzuki. In addition to effective mobility in rough terrain, the Kia will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as high kerbstones, for example.
8

Engine capacity

1,997 > 1,591 cc
The Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4 has 406 cc greater engine capacity than the Suzuki Vitara I. The difference is relatively substantia. As a result the Kia Retona should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand greater cubic capacity usually results in worst fuel economy.
6

Length

4,000 > 3,620 mm
The Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4 is 380 mm longer in comparison to the Suzuki Vitara I Cabrio 1.6 16V 97HP manual 4x4. Long vehicles have more interior space and also provide plenty of trunk space. While the Kia Retona occurs to be better pick for families or those who value soft, smooth long-distance driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Suzuki Vitara I may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,483 > 1,400 mm
3

Number of doors

3 > 2
In this case a user of the Kia Retona gets a one door more as a tailgate. It will enable him to put luggage into a trunk in easier manner, especialy when it comes to things of large size. Passages of both cars who want to seat in the rear need to enter a car through a front door which requires folding a front seat.
1

Model release date

1997 > 1988
Manufacture of the older vehicle commenced 9 years prior to its competitor hence we may expect that this vehicle gives way to Kia Retona because it has not so advanced solutions used.
1

Height

1,834 > 1,665 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of loading massive amount of luggage to it. The difference at the level of 10 percent to the advantage of the Kia is little and does not matter much.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,400 > 5,600 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,824 > 1,498 kg
0

Front track

1,483 > 1,394 mm

Suzuki

2 reasons for Suzuki Vitara I Cabrio 1.6 16V 97KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,000 > 4,695 revolutions/minute
The RMP at which the highest torque is delivered shows us how fast an engine achieves its full efficiency with growth in rmp. The lower revolutions or the wider range at which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration is felt faster.
0

End of model sale

2004 > 2003

Cars specifications

Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V 128HP manual 4x4 Suzuki Vitara I Cabrio 1.6 16V 97HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1997 1988
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload 1,824 kg 1,498 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK