Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual vs Kia Rio II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V 97HP manual

Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

15 reasons for

Nissan Tiida Hatchback, model available from 2004.
It has 1.8 i 126HP petrol engine produced from 2004 to 2009.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Kia Rio II Hatchback 5d, model available from 2005.
It has 1.4 i 16V 97HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Kia Rio II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V 97HP manual
Nissan

15 reasons for Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126KM manual in comparison to Kia Rio II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V 97HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

126 > 97 hp
The horsepower is a feature that most of car fans take into account at first when buying a car. In this case it is the Nissan that has by 30 percent more horsepower in comparison to the Kia Rio II Hatchback 5d. Therefore the Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual can achieve higher top speed. Due to more horsepower the Nissan Tiida will as well provide seemingly more flexiblility in specific speeds.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.4 > 12.3 s
The Kia is relatively slower in relation to the Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual. The difference in the amount of 15 percent is not really significant and it should not be vitally taken into consideration when buying one of these two cars.
33

Top speed

195 > 173 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Nissan Tiida is higher in comparison to this of the Kia which allows to cover the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 22 km/h is not big and is imperceptible in everyday use.
22

Width

1,700 > 1,695 mm
Width of a car directly affects room in the cabin as well as stability on road. The Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual is widther only by 5 millimeters in relation to the Kia Rio II and is not really relevant. The medium for the „lower middle” segment equals to 1,703 mm and is by 3 millimeters bigger than the same feature of the Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual.
19

Fuel tank

51 > 44 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual which can comprise 7 liters more fuel compared with the Kia Rio II. The average fuel container capacity in the small family cars class, which is represented by the Nissan Tiida Hatchback, amounts to 52 liters, whereas in compact segment (represented by the Kia Rio II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V 97HP manual) it is 52 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,604 > 2,500 mm
Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual has 4 percent longer wheelbase than the Kia Rio II Hatchback 5d. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Nissan has only one more speed compared to the Kia Rio II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V 97HP manual. Usually this additional gear is a very tall one thanks to which the previous speeds can be narrower to give better acceleration in the lower gears. One more gear as well affect lower fuel consumption and CO2 emission.
8

Engine capacity

1,798 > 1,398 cc
The Nissan has 29 % larger engine displacement in comparison to the Kia Rio II Hatchback 5d. The difference is big. For this reason the Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher top speed. On the other hand bigger cubic capacity usually means worst fuel economy.
8

Maximum load capacity

503 > 501 kg
6

Length

4,294 > 3,990 mm
The Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual is 8 % longer than the Kia. Long vehicles have more interior space and usually have plenty of trunk space. While the Nissan Tiida Hatchback seems to be better option for families or those who value comfortable driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Kia Rio II Hatchback 5d may be more appropriate to singles because it will not cause problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
1

Height

1,534 > 1,470 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of loading big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 64 millimeters to the advantage of the Nissan is little and should not be really noticeable.
1

Tire width

195 > 185 mm
0

Payload

1,732 > 1,580 kg
0

Tire diameter

15 > 14 ″
0

Curb weight

1,232 > 1,079 kg

Kia

4 reasons for Kia Rio II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V 97KM manual in comparison to Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.1 > 7.8 l
The Kia Rio II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V 97HP manual uses 1.7 l fewer amount of fuel in the combined cycle when compared to the Nissan Tiida. The difference in the amount of 22 percent will be quite realy noticeable in day-to-day usage of the car. In the long period of time it would allow you to make a considerable reduction of costs.
38

Trunk capacity

1,145 > 300 l
The boot of the Kia Rio II Hatchback 5d is 282 percent bigger compared to the Nissan. It is perceptible difference so, in this category the Kia will be a way more convenient. The larger the trunk, the more baggage you can load.
19

Range

763 > 667 km
1

Model release date

2005 > 2004
Given that the Nissan was launched only 1 year earlier than the Kia Rio II, the gap between technology used in both cars is not really big, however, the Kia Rio II may feature slightly more advanced solutions used in it.

Cars specifications

Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual Kia Rio II Hatchback 5d 1.4 i 16V 97HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2004 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
    Payload 1,732 kg 1,580 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK