The fuel consumption of the Mazda 323 VI F is 1.2 l smaller in relation to the Kia Sephia II. Despite the difference is small, in the long run it may make that your car would be much less expensive to exploate.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Kia is relatively slower in
comparison to the Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73HP manual. The
difference at the level of
0.5 s is
not really significant and it should
not be substantially taken into
as important when selecting the better one of presented
Trunk capacity with seats down
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73HP manual is 5 mm wider in comparison to the Kia Sephia II. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
The Kia is worst that the Mazda 323 VI F in the aspect of fuel tank size. The Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73HP manual is able to store by 1 l more fuel in relation to its rival.
Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73HP manual has 2 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to the Kia Sephia II. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
Maximum load capacity
Number of doors
A 5-door car usually means a hatchback and as a result the Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73HP manual, where you can open up the boot lid and fold flat the back seats making more room, has the edge over the 4-door Kia Sephia II 1.5 i 16V GL 88HP manual which is less comfortable to load and unload baggage.
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater capacity of carrying big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 2 mm in favor of the Mazda 323 VI F is little and should not be really noticeable.