Kia Sorento I 2.4 i 16V 139HP manual 4x4 vs Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4

Kia Sorento I 2.4 i 16V 139HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Thomas doerfer Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

19 reasons for

Kia Sorento I, model available from 2002 to 2009.
It has 2.4 i 16V 139HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2009.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

6 reasons for

Subaru Forester II, model available from 2002 to 2008.
It has 2.0 X 125HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4
Kia

19 reasons for Kia Sorento I 2.4 i 16V 139KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

139 > 125 hp
The horsepower of the Kia Sorento I 2.4 i 16V 139HP manual 4x4 is by 11 % grater in comparison to the Subaru. As the difference is not big it should not affect the vehicles performance largely.
38

Trunk capacity

889 > 406 l
The boot of the Kia Sorento I is 119 percent more spacious than the Subaru. It is sensible difference so, in this category the Kia Sorento I will be a way more useful. The larger the trunk, the more baggage you can hold.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,882 > 1,527 l
22

Width

1,856 > 1,735 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Kia is 7 % wider than the Subaru. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Range

734 > 706 km
19

Fuel tank

79 > 61 l
The winner of this comparison in the category of fuel tank size is Kia Sorento I which can take by 18 l more petrol than the Subaru Forester II.
15

Wheelbase

2,713 > 2,534 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to better vehicle's weight distribution. Kia Sorento I 2.4 i 16V 139HP manual 4x4 has 179 millimeters longer wheelbase distance than Subaru Forester II. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Kia Sorento I should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
12

Urban range

541 > 517 km
9

Ground clearance

205 > 199 mm
Ground clearance is the gap between the vehicle body and the ground. As for these two cars, it is the Kia Sorento I which has 6 millimeters higher ride height than the Subaru Forester II. For this reason the Kia Sorento I will deal better when driving over imperfect roads and obstacles in the city. However, the higher ground clearance equals a higher center of gravity, which can adversely affect the handling of the Kia Sorento I 2.4 i 16V 139HP manual 4x4.
8

Engine capacity

2,350 > 1,995 cc
The Kia Sorento I has 355 cubic centimeters bigger cubic capacity compared to the Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4. For the reason that the difference is small, the Kia should accelerate only slightly better, if other paramerters are equal.
6

Length

4,569 > 4,484 mm
The Kia Sorento I 2.4 i 16V 139HP manual 4x4 is 85 millimeters longer in comparison to the Subaru Forester II. Long vehicles are more spacious and usually have plenty of trunk space. While the Kia Sorento I occurs to be better for families or drivers who love the idea of convenient driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Subaru may appeal to city drivers as it will not make troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,578 > 1,485 mm
1

Height

1,730 > 1,590 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater capacity of carrying big amount of thinks to it. The difference of 9 % in favor of the Kia Sorento I is little and should not be really noticeable.
1

Tire width

225 > 205 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 5,600 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,577 > 1,495 mm
0

End of model sale

2009 > 2008
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Curb weight

1,866 > 1,360 kg

Subaru

6 reasons for Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Kia Sorento I 2.4 i 16V 139HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

8.3 > 11.1 l
The Subaru Forester II consumes 25 percent fewer amount of fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Kia. The difference in the amount of 25 % will be significant in day-to-day usage of the car. In the long run it would give a substantial cost reduction.
56

Urban consumption

11.6 > 14.8 l
The Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4 burns up 3.2 l less petrol in the city when compared to the Kia Sorento I. The difference at the level of 22 % is quite appreciable in everyday usage of the ride. What is more, in a long run it will bring you significant savings. Remember that fuel consumption may vary depending on how dynamic you drive
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.4 > 13.4 s
The Kia Sorento I speeds up relatively slower compared to the Subaru Forester II. The difference in the amount of 15 percent is not really significant and it should not be vitally taken by you into account for buying one of presented vehicles.
33

Top speed

180 > 168 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the Subaru is greater as compared to this of the Kia Sorento I 2.4 i 16V 139HP manual 4x4 which allows to travel the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 12 kilometers/hour is little and is imperceptible in everyday driving.
4

Cylinder layout

boxer > inline
A Boxer put inside the Subaru Forester II is noticeably better because it can be shorter and lighter and produces less vibrations compared to engine with cylinders arranged in a straight line. Additionally it is worth knowing its horizontally opposed layout causes that a vehicle has the benefit of a lower center of gravity what affects the better grip. The advantage of engine which cylinders are arranged in a line, like the one placed in the Kia Sorento I, is that due to its simple construction it can be cheaper compared to other types of engines.
0

Tire profile

70 > 75 %

Cars specifications

Kia Sorento I 2.4 i 16V 139HP manual 4x4 Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2002 2002
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload 2,453 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK