Kia Sportage I Cabrio 2.0 i 16V 118HP manual 4x4 vs Suzuki x90 1.6 i 16V 4x4 97HP manual 4x4

Kia Sportage I Cabrio 2.0 i 16V 118HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org IFCAR All Rights Released into the public domain

18 reasons for

Kia Sportage I Cabrio, model available from 1994 to 2002.
It has 2.0 i 16V 118HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2002.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Suzuki x90, model available from 1995 to 1997.
It has 1.6 i 16V 97HP petrol engine produced from 1995 to 1997.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki x90 1.6 i 16V 4x4 97HP manual 4x4
Kia

18 reasons for Kia Sportage I Cabrio 2.0 i 16V 118KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Suzuki x90 1.6 i 16V 4x4 97HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

118 > 97 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of drivers pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Kia Sportage I Cabrio 2.0 i 16V 118HP manual 4x4 which has by 21 horsepower more in comparison to the Suzuki x90 1.6 i 16V 4x4 97HP manual 4x4, which makes this vehicle somewhat faster. Thanks to more horsepower the Kia Sportage I Cabrio should also provide slightly more efficiency in specific gears.
59

Maximal torque

167 > 132 Nm
The Kia Sportage I Cabrio has 35 newton meters more torque than the Suzuki x90. Although a great deal of drivers do not attach importance the maximum torque when choosing a automobile, it shows the best how fast a car is speeding up. In this case the difference is relevant thus the Kia Sportage I Cabrio 2.0 i 16V 118HP manual 4x4 will deliver you better feeling of driving.
38

Trunk capacity

245 > 237 l
The boot of the Kia Sportage I Cabrio 2.0 i 16V 118HP manual 4x4 is only 8 liters bigger than the Suzuki x90. However, the difference is so little that it would be right to say that both vehicles have more of less the same trunk capacity.
33

Top speed

172 > 150 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Kia is greater in comparison to of the Suzuki by 22 km/h, which allows the Kia Sportage I Cabrio to travel faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 22 km/h is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,735 > 1,694 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Kia Sportage I Cabrio 2.0 i 16V 118HP manual 4x4 is 41 mm wider when compared to the Suzuki x90 1.6 i 16V 4x4 97HP manual 4x4. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

52 > 42 l
The Suzuki x90 is worst that the Kia in the category of fuel tank size. The Kia Sportage I is able to take by 10 l more fuel compared with its competitor.
15

Wheelbase

2,363 > 2,210 mm
Kia Sportage I has 153 mm longer wheelbase in relation to the Suzuki. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. But, cars having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
8

Engine capacity

1,997 > 1,591 cc
The Kia Sportage I Cabrio has 26 percent bigger cubic capacity in relation to the Suzuki x90. The difference is big. Consequently the Kia Sportage I should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand bigger engine displacement usually means worst fuel efficiency.
6

Length

3,756 > 3,709 mm
The Kia is 1 % longer than the Suzuki. Long vehicles are more spacious and usually have bigger trunk. While the Kia occurs to be better for families or persons who appreciate comfortable rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Suzuki x90 may be more appropriate to singles as it will not cause troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,442 > 1,430 mm
3

Number of doors

3 > 2
In this case a user of the Kia Sportage I Cabrio 2.0 i 16V 118HP manual 4x4 gets an additional door at the back of a car. It will enable him to place stuff into a trunk in more convenient manner, especialy when we are talking about things of big size. Passages of both cars who want to seat in the back have to enter a car through a front door which needs folding a front seat.
1

Height

1,657 > 1,535 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Kia Sportage I Cabrio, which is by 8 % higher than the Suzuki x90 1.6 i 16V 4x4 97HP manual 4x4, would be better choice for you. However, compared vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.
1

Tire width

205 > 195 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,300 > 5,600 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

5 > 2
0

Front track

1,440 > 1,425 mm
0

End of model sale

2002 > 1997
0

Curb weight

1,368 > 1,046 kg

Suzuki

4 reasons for Suzuki x90 1.6 i 16V 4x4 97KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Kia Sportage I Cabrio 2.0 i 16V 118HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

13.3 > 14.7 s
The Kia Sportage I Cabrio 2.0 i 16V 118HP manual 4x4 is relatively slower compared with the Suzuki x90. The difference at the level of 1.4 s is quite little and it should not be substantially taken by you into account for selecting the better one of compared cars.
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,000 > 4,495 revolutions/minute
A greater range as well as a lower value of rotations at which the maximum torque is produced has an impact on an engine’s performance. However, to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is recommended to analyze a torque graph.
1

Model release date

1995 > 1994
The difference in date of commencement of production between these two cars is only 1 year, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a dizzying pace what may cause that the Suzuki may have more modern technologieswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
0

Tire profile

65 > 70 %

Cars specifications

Kia Sportage I Cabrio 2.0 i 16V 118HP manual 4x4 Suzuki x90 1.6 i 16V 4x4 97HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1994 1995
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload 1,896 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK