Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual vs Kia Sportage III SUV 1.6 GDI 135HP manual

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Kickaffe Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

14 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Kia Sportage III SUV, model available from 2010.
It has 1.6 GDI 135HP petrol engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Kia Sportage III SUV 1.6 GDI 135HP manual
Nissan

14 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to Kia Sportage III SUV 1.6 GDI 135HP manual

Reasons for
115

Average consumption

5.6 > 7 l
The Nissan Qashqai II uses 1.4 l less in the mixed cycle in relation to the Kia Sportage III SUV. The difference at the level of 1.4 l is not significant. At the same time in the long run it would allow you to make a substantial cost reduction.
59

Maximal torque

190 > 166 Nm
Maximum torque of the Nissan Qashqai II is 24 newton meters higher than the Kia Sportage III SUV. As a result, the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual will accelerate somewhat better and be better to overtake other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also cause that the Nissan Qashqai II will burn up on average fever fuel for every 100 km.
54

Urban consumption

6.9 > 8.2 l
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual uses of 16 percent fuel fewer in the city compared to the Kia. The Nissan Qashqai II, which is classified in mini 4x4 segment, consumes of 2.7 l per 100 km less than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “mini 4x4” class is 9.6 l/100Km.
29

Maximal torque RPM

2,005 > 4,845 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rotations per minute at which the maximum torque is delivered distinctly indicates that the winner is is this of the Nissan Qashqai II. The engine of the Kia Sportage III SUV 1.6 GDI 135HP manual achieves its full efficiency at 4,845 revolutions per minute which is by 59 % lower than the Nissan Qashqai II.
28

Top speed

183 > 178 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Nissan Qashqai II is greater compared with this of the Kia Sportage III SUV 1.6 GDI 135HP manual by 5 km/h, which allows the Nissan Qashqai II to travel quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 5 kilometers/hour is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
23

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 6 l
16

Wheelbase

2,644 > 2,639 mm
The Nissan has 5 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to Kia Sportage III SUV. Thanks to this the Nissan is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
16

Range

982 > 809 km
12

Urban range

797 > 671 km
8

Extra-urban range

1,122 > 917 km
7

Maximum load capacity

542 > 480 kg
2

Model release date

2014 > 2010
Given that the Kia's production began only 4 years before the Nissan Qashqai II, the gap between technology used in both vehicles shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Nissan might feature a bit more new solutions used in it.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 6,300 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,860 > 1,827 kg

Kia

10 reasons for Kia Sportage III SUV 1.6 GDI 135KM manual in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
138

Maximal power

135 > 115 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that most of us pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Kia Sportage III SUV 1.6 GDI 135HP manual which has by 17 % horsepower more in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II, which makes this vehicle somewhat quicker. Because of more horsepower the Kia Sportage III SUV 1.6 GDI 135HP manual should as well provide slightly more efficiency in specific speeds.
47

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.1 > 11.3 s
The Kia Sportage III SUV can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 11.1 s, which is 0.2 s faster than the Nissan Qashqai II. However the difference is not as much significant to be taken into consideration when buying a ride.
36

Trunk capacity

464 > 438 l
If you are looking for a vehicles for long travels, which could carry more luggage , decide to buy the Kia Sportage III SUV. The Nissan is equiped with by 6 percent smaller boot than the Nissan Qashqai II so you would be able to put in the trunk one little suitcase less. Assessing the luggage compartment pay attention to its width length and height which have considerable effect on loading possibility .
20

Width

1,857 > 1,800 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Kia Sportage III SUV is 57 millimeters wider when compared to the Nissan Qashqai II. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
9

Length

4,440 > 4,380 mm
The Kia Sportage III SUV 1.6 GDI 135HP manual is 60 mm longer than the Nissan. The length of the vehicle is important in respect of driving comfort and room in the boot. The Kia preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Kia Sportage III SUV 1.6 GDI 135HP manual will be better driven but the Nissan will be a bit easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
4

Engine capacity

1,590 > 1,198 cc
The engine capacity of the Kia Sportage III SUV 1.6 GDI 135HP manual is by 33 percent bigger in relation to the Nissan. As a result the Nissan Qashqai II will be more fuel efficient, however, the engine of the Kia Sportage III SUV will be of better performance, running more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
3

Rear track

1,617 > 1,563 mm
2

Height

1,637 > 1,590 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk thinks of big size, the Kia Sportage III SUV, which is by 47 millimeters higher than the Nissan, would be better choice for you. However, compared cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Front track

1,614 > 1,564 mm
0

Curb weight

1,350 > 1,314 kg

Cars specifications

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual Kia Sportage III SUV 1.6 GDI 135HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,199 kg -
    Model release date 2014 2010
    Price range popular popular
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK