Kia Venga 1.4 DOHC CVVT 90HP manual vs Toyota Verso-S 1.33 Dual VVT-i 99HP manual

Kia Venga 1.4 DOHC CVVT 90HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

16 reasons for

Kia Venga, model available from 2009.
It has 1.4 DOHC CVVT 90HP petrol engine produced from 2009.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Toyota Verso-S, model available from 2011 to 2013.
It has 1.33 Dual VVT-i 99HP petrol engine produced from 2011 to 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Toyota Verso-S 1.33 Dual VVT-i 99HP manual
Kia

16 reasons for Kia Venga 1.4 DOHC CVVT 90KM manual in comparison to Toyota Verso-S 1.33 Dual VVT-i 99HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.1 > 5.4 l
The Kia consumes 0.3 l less fuel in the combined cycle when compared to the Toyota Verso-S. The Kia, which is palced in „microvan” class consumes by 1 l less of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 6.1 l.
59

Maximal torque

138 > 123 Nm
The Kia Venga has 12 % more torque in comparison to the Toyota Verso-S. Although the majority of people do not take into account the maximum torque when buying a vehicle, it presents the best how fast a car is speeding up. In this case the difference is not really big and for that reason you probably will not feel the difference.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.1 > 13.3 s
A little difference at the level of 17 percent indicates that the Toyota Verso-S 1.33 Dual VVT-i 99HP manual is the worst vehicle of these two presented. In the „microvan segment, being represented by the Toyota Verso-S, the average acceleration to 100km/h is 13.6 s and is by 0.3 s lower than this of Toyota vehicle.
33

Top speed

185 > 170 km/h
The maximum speed of the Kia Venga 1.4 DOHC CVVT 90HP manual is higher in comparison to this of the Toyota Verso-S 1.33 Dual VVT-i 99HP manual which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 9 % is not big and is imperceptible in daily driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,995 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower number of revolutions at which the highest torque is produced determines an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. However, to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is recommended to analyze a torque graph.
22

Width

1,763 > 1,695 mm
distance between left and right side of a car directly influences on the amount of space for passengers as well as stability while driving. The width of the Kia is larger by 68 millimeters compared with the Toyota Verso-S 1.33 Dual VVT-i 99HP manual and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „microvan” segment equals to 1,748 mm and is by 15 millimeters smaller than the same attribute of the Kia Venga.
15

Wheelbase

2,605 > 2,548 mm
Kia Venga has 2 percent longer wheelbase when compared to the Toyota. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
8

Engine capacity

1,581 > 1,329 cc
The Kia has 19 % larger engine capacity than the Toyota Verso-S. Because the difference is not big, the Kia Venga should accelerate only a bit faster, assuming that other paramerters are equal.
8

Maximum load capacity

529 > 445 kg
6

Length

4,068 > 3,995 mm
The Kia Venga 1.4 DOHC CVVT 90HP manual is 73 millimeters longer than the Toyota Verso-S. The length of the vehicle plays a role when it comes to driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Kia Venga probably will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Kia Venga will be better driven but the Toyota will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,559 > 1,461 mm
1

Height

1,602 > 1,594 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of loading massive amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars of 1 % to the advantage of the Kia Venga is small and should not be really noticeable.
1

Tire width

195 > 185 mm
0

Payload

1,810 > 1,517 kg
0

Front track

1,556 > 1,470 mm
0

Curb weight

1,282 > 1,073 kg

Toyota

10 reasons for Toyota Verso-S 1.33 Dual VVT-i 99KM manual in comparison to Kia Venga 1.4 DOHC CVVT 90HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

99 > 90 hp
The horsepower of the Toyota Verso-S is 9 hp bigger in relation to the Kia Venga. Because the difference is little it should not affect the car performance considerably.
56

Urban consumption

6.5 > 7.5 l
The Toyota Verso-S uses 13 percent fewer in city traffic in comparison to the Kia Venga. The difference at the level of 1 liter is not very appreciable in everyday usage of the ride at the same time in a few years it would allow you to make a real savings.
38

Trunk capacity

484 > 422 l
If you are looking for a car by which you could set of for trips, which could carry more luggage , take the Toyota. The Kia is equiped with by 15 % less capable luggage compartment in comparison to the Kia Venga 1.4 DOHC CVVT 90HP manual so you would be able to load one bag less. Examining the luggage compartment pay attention to its dimensions which have appreciable effect on loading capability .
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,024 > 553 l
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.8 > 5.5 l
19

Range

1,019 > 980 km
19

Fuel tank

56 > 47 l
The winner of this comparison in the category of fuel tank size is Toyota Verso-S that can take by 9 l more gasoline in comparison to the Kia.
12

Urban range

846 > 640 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,146 > 873 km
1

Model release date

2011 > 2009
Given that the Kia Venga 1.4 DOHC CVVT 90HP manual was introduced only 2 years earlier than the Toyota Verso-S, the gap between technology used in both vehicles is not really huge, however, the Toyota Verso-S may feature a bit more advanced solutions applied in it.

Cars specifications

Kia Venga 1.4 DOHC CVVT 90HP manual Toyota Verso-S 1.33 Dual VVT-i 99HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 798 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2009 2011
    Facelifting no no
    Class microvan microvan
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK