Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual vs Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 16V 109HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Thomas doerfer Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 16V 109HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

12 reasons for

Kia cee'd I Hatchback, model available from 2006 to 2012.
It has 1.4 109HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2009.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Peugeot 307 II Hatchback, model available from 2005 to 2012.
It has 1.6 16V 109HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2008.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

12 reasons for Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109KM manual in comparison to Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 16V 109HP manual

Reasons for

112

Average consumption

6.3 > 7.4 l

The Kia cee'd I consumes 15 % less in the combined cycle in relation to the Peugeot 307 II. The difference in the amount of 15 percent is not realy noticeable. At the same time in the long run it would allow you to make a real savings.

Add a comment

Urban consumption

7.6 > 10 l

The Kia cee'd I uses 24 % less fuel in city traffic than the Peugeot. The difference at the level of 24 percent is quite big in daily using vehicle. Additionally, within many months it may bring huge savings. Also keep in mind that medium results of the average fuel consumption can be considerably lifted if you drive swiftly. The difference in fuel economy of the cars compared by you is so huge that you should consider to choose cars with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision have a sense.

Add a comment

Extra-urban consumption

5.2 > 6 l

Add a comment

Width

1,790 > 1,740 mm

The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Kia cee'd I is 3 percent wider in comparison to the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.

Add a comment

Wheelbase

2,659 > 2,610 mm

The wheelbase of a car equals the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of better car's weight distribution. Kia has 2 % longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 16V 109HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.

Add a comment

Maximum load capacity

603 > 438 kg

Add a comment

Length

4,235 > 4,212 mm

The Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual is 1 percent longer than the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 16V 109HP manual. The length of the car is important when it comes to driving comfort and space in the boot. The Kia probably will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Kia cee'd I Hatchback will be better driven ,however, the Peugeot 307 II will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.

Add a comment

Rear track

1,544 > 1,499 mm

Add a comment

Model release date

2006 > 2005

The difference in date of commencement of production between these two vehicles is only 1 year, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a blistering pace what may cause that the Kia cee'd I may feature more advanced solutions.

Add a comment

Payload

1,878 > 1,696 kg

Add a comment

Front track

1,546 > 1,505 mm

Add a comment

Curb weight

1,277 > 1,266 kg

Add a comment

Reasons for

Maximal torque

146 > 138 Nm

Maximum torque of the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 16V 109HP manual is 8 Nm bigger than the Kia cee'd I Hatchback. Because of this, the Peugeot 307 II will accelerate a little bit swifter and be better for overtaking other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also cause that the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 16V 109HP manual will consume fever fuel for every 100 km.

Add a comment

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.7 > 11.6 s

The Peugeot accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h in 10.7 s, which is 0.9 s less in comparison to the Kia cee'd I Hatchback. But the difference is not as much big to be taken into account when buying a ride.

Add a comment

Top speed

190 > 187 km/h

The top speed of the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 16V 109HP manual is greater as compared to this of the Kia cee'd I Hatchback which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 3 kilometers per hour is little and is not realy noticable in everyday use.

Add a comment

Maximal torque RPM

3,995 > 4,995 revolutions/minute

A greater range and a lower number of revolutions at which the highest torque is reached affects an engine’s dynamism and flexibility. However, to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always recommended to see a torque performance graph.

Add a comment

Engine capacity

1,588 > 1,395 cc

The Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 16V 109HP manual has by 14 percent bigger engine capacity in relation to the Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual. This play a little role when it comes to accleration, as both values does not vary much.

Add a comment

Height

1,522 > 1,479 mm

If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Peugeot, which is by 43 millimeters higher than the Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual, is appropriate option for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.

Add a comment