Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual vs Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual

Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Thomas doerfer Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

11 reasons for

Kia cee'd I Hatchback, model available from 2006 to 2012.
It has 1.4 109HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2009.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Peugeot 307 II Hatchback, model available from 2005 to 2012.
It has 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP diesel engine produced from 2005 to 2008.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual
Kia

11 reasons for Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109KM manual in comparison to Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

109 > 90 hp
The horsepower is a something that majority of drivers pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Kia which has by 19 horsepower more when compared to the Peugeot 307 II, which makes this car a bit quicker. Having more horsepower the Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual will also provide somewhat more flexiblility in specific speeds.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.6 > 12.5 s
A small difference in the amount of 0.9 s suggests that the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual is insignificantly beaten in this confrontation. In the „small family cars” class, to which the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual is assigned, the medium acceleration amounts to 11.3 s and is by 1.2 s faster than acceleration of Peugeot’s vehicle.
33

Top speed

187 > 179 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual is greater than of the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback by 8 kilometers per hour, which allows the Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual to cover faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 8 km/h is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,790 > 1,740 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual is 3 % wider in comparison to the Peugeot. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,659 > 2,610 mm
The Kia has 49 mm longer wheelbase in relation to Peugeot. Consequently the Kia is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable riding.
8

Maximum load capacity

603 > 481 kg
6

Length

4,235 > 4,212 mm
The Kia cee'd I Hatchback is 1 % longer in relation to the Peugeot 307 II. Long vehicles are more spacious and also provide bigger trunk. While the Kia seems to be better for families or those who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Peugeot 307 II may appeal to city drivers as it will not make troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,544 > 1,499 mm
1

Model release date

2006 > 2005
Because of the fact that the Peugeot was introduced only 1 year prior to the Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual, the distance in technology applied in both vehicles is not really huge, however, the Kia cee'd I may have a bit more new solutions applied in it.
0

Payload

1,878 > 1,766 kg
0

Front track

1,546 > 1,505 mm

Peugeot

9 reasons for Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90KM manual in comparison to Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

4.9 > 6.3 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual's advantage. This car burns 1.4 l less fuel in the combined cycle when compared with the Kia. Bear in mind that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the compact class, in which the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback is classified, is 6.8 l while the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback uses by 28 percent less fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

214 > 138 Nm
Due to 55 % greater torque, the engine of the Peugeot 307 II distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Kia. This, in turn, have positive implications for acceleration.
56

Urban consumption

6.1 > 7.6 l
The fuel consumption of the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual is 20 % smaller than the Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual. Despite the fact that the difference is insensible, in the long run it may make that the car would be much cheper to use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,745 > 4,995 revolutions/minute
This huge difference results from the fact that both compared cars are equipped with different engines. The Peugeot 307 II has the diesel engine, the Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual is equipped with the petrol engine. Taking into consideration different kinds of engines, comparing this characteristic has no sense.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.5 > 5.2 l
8

Engine capacity

1,561 > 1,395 cc
The Peugeot 307 II has by 12 percent bigger engine displacement than the Kia cee'd I Hatchback. This may have a little impact as far as acceleration is concerned, as both values are quite simmilar.
1

Height

1,522 > 1,479 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Peugeot, which is by 3 percent higher than the Kia cee'd I Hatchback, is appropriate pick for you. However, compared vehicles do not differ much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 6,200 revolutions/minute
0

Curb weight

1,293 > 1,277 kg

Cars specifications

Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,364 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2006 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK