The horsepower of the Kia cee'd I is 9 % grater in comparison to the Volvo. While the difference is little this should not affect the car performance extensively.
The Kia uses 0.6 l fewer fuel in the mixed cycle when compared to the Volvo C30. The Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual, being classified in „lower middle” segment uses by 0.5 l less amount of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 6.8 l.
The fuel consumption of the Kia cee'd I is 18 percent smaller when compared to the Volvo C30. Despite the fact that the difference is small, in the long term it may cause that your car would be noticably cheper to run.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
A little difference that amounts to 0.2 s shows that the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual is the worst vehicle of these two compared. In the „C class, being represented by the Volvo, the medium acceleration amounts to 11.3 s and is by 0.5 s higher than this of Volvo vehicle.
The maximum speed of the Kia cee'd I Hatchback is greater than the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d by 1, which allows the Kia cee'd I to travel quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 1 % is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
distance between left and right side of a car directly affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability during driving. The width of the Kia cee'd I is larger by 12 millimeters compared with the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual and is not really important. The medium for the „C” segment equals to 1,703 millimeters and is by 87 millimeters smaller than the same attribute of the Kia.
Kia has 12 millimeters longer wheelbase when compared to the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
Maximum load capacity
Number of doors
It seems to be quite obvious that the five-door Kia cee'd I is more convenient and if you frequently carry more than one passenger then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The biggest advantage of a five-door vehicle is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the rear seats but it’s as well easier to place luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual generally look more dynamic and sporty and for those who don’t often have passengers in the back seat the Volvo might be better one, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of putting massive amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars of 2 millimeters in favor of the Kia cee'd I Hatchback is small and should not be really noticeable.