Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual vs Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual

Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Thomas doerfer Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

16 reasons for

Kia cee'd I Hatchback, model available from 2006 to 2012.
It has 1.4 109HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2009.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

6 reasons for

Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d, model available from 2006 to 2012.
It has 1.6 100HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual
Kia

16 reasons for Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109KM manual in comparison to Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

109 > 100 hp
The horsepower of the Kia cee'd I is 9 % grater in comparison to the Volvo. While the difference is little this should not affect the car performance extensively.
112

Average consumption

6.3 > 6.9 l
The Kia uses 0.6 l fewer fuel in the mixed cycle when compared to the Volvo C30. The Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual, being classified in „lower middle” segment uses by 0.5 l less amount of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 6.8 l.
56

Urban consumption

7.6 > 9.3 l
The fuel consumption of the Kia cee'd I is 18 percent smaller when compared to the Volvo C30. Despite the fact that the difference is small, in the long term it may cause that your car would be noticably cheper to run.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.6 > 11.8 s
A little difference that amounts to 0.2 s shows that the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual is the worst vehicle of these two compared. In the „C class, being represented by the Volvo, the medium acceleration amounts to 11.3 s and is by 0.5 s higher than this of Volvo vehicle.
33

Top speed

187 > 185 km/h
The maximum speed of the ​​Kia cee'd I Hatchback is greater than the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d by 1, which allows the Kia cee'd I to travel quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 1 % is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.2 > 5.7 l
22

Width

1,790 > 1,778 mm
distance between left and right side of a car directly affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability during driving. The width of the Kia cee'd I is larger by 12 millimeters compared with the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual and is not really important. The medium for the „C” segment equals to 1,703 millimeters and is by 87 millimeters smaller than the same attribute of the Kia.
15

Wheelbase

2,659 > 2,647 mm
Kia has 12 millimeters longer wheelbase when compared to the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
8

Maximum load capacity

603 > 425 kg
4

Rear track

1,544 > 1,531 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
It seems to be quite obvious that the five-door Kia cee'd I is more convenient and if you frequently carry more than one passenger then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The biggest advantage of a five-door vehicle is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the rear seats but it’s as well easier to place luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual generally look more dynamic and sporty and for those who don’t often have passengers in the back seat the Volvo might be better one, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
1

Height

1,479 > 1,477 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of putting massive amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars of 2 millimeters in favor of the Kia cee'd I Hatchback is small and should not be really noticeable.
0

Payload

1,878 > 1,700 kg
0

Front track

1,546 > 1,535 mm
0

Sill height

686 > 805 mm
0

Curb weight

1,277 > 1,274 kg

Volvo

6 reasons for Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100KM manual in comparison to Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual

Reasons for
59

Maximal torque

150 > 138 Nm
The Volvo has 12 newton meters more torque in comparison to the Kia cee'd I Hatchback. Although a large number of drivers do not take into account the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it shows the best how a car is speeding up. When it comes to compared cars the difference is not really big so the difference will not be much noticeable.
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,000 > 4,995 revolutions/minute
A greater range as well as a lower number of revolutions at which the maximum torque is reached has an impact on an engine’s dynamism and flexibility. However, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is always good to analyze a torque performance graph.
8

Engine capacity

1,597 > 1,395 cc
The Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d has 202 cubic centimeters larger engine displacement than the Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual. Because the difference is not big, the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual should accelerate slightly better, of course if other paramerters are the same.
6

Length

4,271 > 4,235 mm
The Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d is 36 millimeters longer when compared to the Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual. The length of the car plays a role in terms of travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual preasumbly will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Volvo C30 will be better driven ,however, the Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual will be a slightly easier to park because of shorter length .
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Maximal power RPM

6,000 > 6,200 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Kia cee'd I Hatchback 1.4 109HP manual Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 2006 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
    Payload 1,878 kg 1,700 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK