Kia cee'd II Hatchback 3d 1.6 GDI 135HP manual vs Subaru Trezia 1.4D 90HP automatic

Kia cee'd II Hatchback 3d 1.6 GDI 135HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

16 reasons for

Kia cee'd II Hatchback 3d, model available from 2012.
It has 1.6 GDI 135HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Subaru Trezia, model available from 2010.
It has 1.4D 90HP ic diesel engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

Subaru Trezia 1.4D 90HP automatic
Kia

16 reasons for Kia cee'd II Hatchback 3d 1.6 GDI 135KM manual in comparison to Subaru Trezia 1.4D 90HP automatic

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

135 > 90 hp
The horsepower is a something that most of drivers take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this case it is the Kia cee'd II Hatchback 3d 1.6 GDI 135HP manual which has by 50 percent more horsepower in comparison to the Subaru Trezia 1.4D 90HP automatic. Therefore the Kia will reach higher maximum speed. With more horsepower the Kia should also give better flexiblility in specific speeds.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.9 > 13 s
The Subaru Trezia 1.4D 90HP automatic speeds up relatively slower in relation to the Kia cee'd II Hatchback 3d 1.6 GDI 135HP manual. The difference in the amount of 3.1 s is is slightly to the Kia cee'd II advantage, however, it should not be substantially taken by you into consideration when choosing one of compared vehicles.
33

Top speed

195 > 175 km/h
The top speed of the ​​Kia cee'd II Hatchback 3d 1.6 GDI 135HP manual is greater than this of the Subaru Trezia 1.4D 90HP automatic by 11, which allows the Kia to overcome faster long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 20 kilometers per hour is small and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,784 > 1,658 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Kia cee'd II is 8 % wider when compared to the Subaru Trezia 1.4D 90HP automatic. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,642 > 2,557 mm
The Kia has 3 percent longer wheelbase than Subaru Trezia. As a result the Kia cee'd II Hatchback 3d is safer and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
8

Engine capacity

1,590 > 1,365 cc
The Kia cee'd II Hatchback 3d has 225 cc larger engine capacity than the Subaru. For the reason that the difference is little, the Kia cee'd II Hatchback 3d should accelerate a bit dynamically, of course if other paramerters are equal.
8

Maximum load capacity

628 > 420 kg
6

Length

4,312 > 3,990 mm
The Kia cee'd II is 322 mm longer in comparison to the Subaru Trezia. Long cars more of passenger space and in most cases provide bigger trunk. While the Kia cee'd II occurs to be better option for families or those who love the idea of comfortable rides, the Subaru Trezia may be more appropriate to the young as it will not make troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,549 > 1,475 mm
1

Model release date

2012 > 2010
Given that the Subaru Trezia's production began only 2 years earlier than the Kia, the distance in technology applied in both vehicles shouldn’t be really big, however, the Kia cee'd II might have slightly more new solutions applied in it.
0

Turning circle

5.2 > 5.4 m.
A vehicle’s turning radius affects how well it is able to act in tight conditions and into pint-size parking spaces. Generally speaking, the tighter a turning radius, the better it can handle small spots. The Kia cee'd II has by 0.2 m. lower turning radius in comparison to the Subaru Trezia. But compared cars doesn’t differ so much to be quite noticeable.
0

Payload

1,815 > 1,608 kg
0

Front track

1,554 > 1,485 mm
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 8
0

Curb weight

1,188 > 1,185 kg

Subaru

10 reasons for Subaru Trezia 1.4D 90KM automat in comparison to Kia cee'd II Hatchback 3d 1.6 GDI 135HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

4.7 > 6.3 l
The Subaru Trezia consumes 25 % fewer amount of fuel in the combined cycle when compared to the Kia cee'd II Hatchback 3d 1.6 GDI 135HP manual. The difference in the amount of 25 % will be quite significant in everyday usage of the vehicle. In the long run it would give a considerable reduction of costs.
59

Maximal torque

205 > 165 Nm
Maximum torque of the Subaru Trezia is 40 Nm higher than the Kia cee'd II Hatchback 3d 1.6 GDI 135HP manual. For this reason, the Subaru will accelerate a little bit faster and be better to overtake other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also make that the Subaru Trezia 1.4D 90HP automatic will consume fever fuel per 100 kilometers.
56

Urban consumption

6.7 > 8 l
The Subaru Trezia uses 16 percent less running around the town when compared to the Kia cee'd II. The difference in the amount of 16 percent is not realy noticeable in daily usage of the vehicle, however, during the term of a several months it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
38

Trunk capacity

428 > 380 l
The boot of the Subaru Trezia is only 13 % bigger than the Kia cee'd II Hatchback 3d. However, the difference is so little that it would be right to say that both vehicles have similar boot capacity.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,800 > 4,845 revolutions/minute
Such a big difference results from the fact that both vehicles are equipped with different engines. The Subaru is equipped with the diesel engine whereas the Kia cee'd II Hatchback 3d 1.6 GDI 135HP manual is equipped with the petrol engine. Because of the fact that these cars has different types of engines, comparing this characteristic is pointless.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4 > 4.8 l
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no question that the five-door Subaru is more convenient and if you regularly carry more than one people then this car is only possible option for you. The biggest advantage of a five-door vehicle is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the rear seats but it’s as well easier to put luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Kia cee'd II generally look more dynamic and sporty and for those who don’t often have more than one passengers in the car the Kia may be more appropriate, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
1

Height

1,585 > 1,431 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater possibility of carrying massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 154 millimeters in favor of the Subaru Trezia is little and should not be really noticeable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
A manual transmission that is placed in the Kia cee'd II Hatchback 3d 1.6 GDI 135HP manual is less complex construction and is cheaper in use but also it is less comfortable as it requires the driver to work with the clutch and change speeds and it can be lot of inconvenience in a jammed city traffic where we have lots of stop and go conditions. An automatic transmission which is put in the Subaru Trezia with gears in the amount of 6 – speeds gearbox is in our opinion better one.
0

Maximal power RPM

3,800 > 6,300 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Kia cee'd II Hatchback 3d 1.6 GDI 135HP manual Subaru Trezia 1.4D 90HP automatic
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2012 2010
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
    Payload 1,815 kg 1,608 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK