Subaru Forester III 2.0 150HP manual vs Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4

Subaru Forester III 2.0 150HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

24 reasons for

Subaru Forester III, model available from 2008 to 2012.
It has 2.0 150HP petrol engine produced from 2008 to 2012.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

3 reasons for

Lada Niva 2131, model available from 1980.
It has 1.8 82HP petrol engine produced from 1995 to 2004.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4
Subaru

24 reasons for Subaru Forester III 2.0 150KM manual in comparison to Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

150 > 82 hp
The Subaru Forester III comes with petrol which produce by 83 percent more horsepower over the Lada Niva, transforming the car to a more dynamic character. It should be better option to those who would like to feel thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
112

Average consumption

8.4 > 12.5 l
The Subaru Forester III burns up 33 percent fewer amount of fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the Lada. The difference at the level of 4.1 l will be very appreciable in day-to-day usage of the vehicle. In the long period of time it will bring you a considerable reduction of costs.
59

Maximal torque

196 > 139 Nm
The Subaru Forester III has 57 Nm more torque in relation to the Lada. Even though the vast majority of drivers do not take into account the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it shows the best how fast a car is speeding up. As far as these two vehicles are cars the difference is substantial and for that reason the Subaru Forester III 2.0 150HP manual will deliver you better sensation of driving.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11 > 22 s
If a swift driving is what you are keen on, the Subaru Forester III 2.0 150HP manual fits you better because it’s acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is 50 percent better in comparison to the Lada Niva.
38

Trunk capacity

448 > 265 l
The Subaru Forester III features 183 l more capable trunk compared with the Lada. Such a difference is relevant so it will affect the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. It is worth to note that the Subaru has 3 liters bigger trunk capacity than the average in its segment. More spacious boot will be useful during family traveling and also during daily driving.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,611 > 710 l
33

Top speed

184 > 135 km/h
The Subaru Forester III has by 36 percent higher top speed in comparison to the Lada Niva, thanks to which a long distance, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, can be traveled much more faster. The difference might be noticeable during travelling on highways.
22

Width

1,777 > 1,680 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Subaru is 6 percent wider in relation to the Lada. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Range

698 > 528 km
8

Engine capacity

1,995 > 1,775 cc
The Subaru has 12 percent bigger engine displacement than the Lada Niva. Because the difference is little, the Subaru Forester III should accelerate only slightly better, of course assuming that other paramerters are does not play a role.
8

Maximum load capacity

550 > 500 kg
6

Length

4,560 > 4,239 mm
The Subaru is 8 percent longer in relation to the Lada. Long vehicles have more interior space and also provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Subaru Forester III seems to be better option for families or those who love the idea of convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4 may be more appropriate to city drivers as it will not cause problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,528 > 1,400 mm
4

Cylinder layout

boxer > inline
A Boxer put inside the Subaru Forester III occurs to be noticeably better because it can be shorter and lighter and generates less vibrations compared to In-line engine. Additionally it is worth knowing that its horizontally opposed layout causes that a car has the benefit of a lower center of gravity what affects the better grip. The advantage of In-line engine, like the one placed in the Lada Niva 2131, is that because of its simple construction it can be fuel efficient compared to other types of engines.
3

Price range

popular > cheap
1

Height

1,700 > 1,640 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Subaru Forester III, which is by 4 percent higher than the Lada Niva 2131, is better option for you. However, presented vehicles do not vary much in its height and it should not be much perceptible.
1

Model release date

2008 > 1980
1

Tire width

215 > 175 mm
0

Payload

2,015 > 1,872 kg
0

Front track

1,533 > 1,432 mm
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 8
0

Tire profile

65 > 80 %
0

Curb weight

1,463 > 1,369 kg

Łada

3 reasons for Łada Niva 2131 1.8 82KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Subaru Forester III 2.0 150HP manual

Reasons for
19

Fuel tank

66 > 61 l
In this category it is the Lada Niva 2131 which can carry 8 percent more fuel than the Subaru Forester III. The medium fuel container size in the mini 4x4 segment, which is represented by the Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4, is 61 l, whereas in mini 4x4 segment (represented by the Subaru Forester III) it amounts to 61 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,700 > 2,607 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Lada Niva has 4 % longer wheelbase distance when compared to Subaru. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Lada Niva 2131 should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,200 > 6,000 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Subaru Forester III 2.0 150HP manual Lada Niva 2131 1.8 82HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 2,000 kg -
    Price range popular cheap
    Model release date 2008 1980
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK