Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio 6.2 i V12 48V 580HP manual 4x4 vs MG TF I Cabrio 1.8 116HP

Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio 6.2 i V12 48V 580HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

8 reasons for

Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio, model available from 2001.
It has 6.2 i V12 48V 580HP petrol engine produced from 2004 to 2006.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

3 reasons for

MG TF I Cabrio, model available from 2002 to 2005.
It has 1.8 116HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2005.
Drive has manual gearbox.

MG TF I Cabrio 1.8 116HP
Lamborghini

8 reasons for Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio 6.2 i V12 48V 580KM manual 4x4 in comparison to MG TF I Cabrio 1.8 116HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

580 > 116 hp
The MG quite much loses with the Lamborghini Murcielago in the category of horsepower having them by 464 horsepowers less. Consequently the engine of the Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio 6.2 i V12 48V 580HP manual 4x4, as opposed to the MG TF I, produces relatively lots of power and rapid acceleration.
22

Width

2,045 > 1,630 mm
The difference that amounts to 415 millimeters between compared cars is quite significant. For a city driving where such a features as maneuverability and ease of parking play a role, probably the MG TF I Cabrio occurs to be better for you. Nevertheless, the Lamborghini Murcielago features a better comfort, more spacious interior and stiffer driveability when driving fast in steep curves.
19

Fuel tank

100 > 50 l
The winner of selected cars in the category of fuel tank capacity is Lamborghini which can carry by 50 l more petrol compared with the MG TF I.
15

Wheelbase

2,673 > 2,380 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to better car's weight distribution. Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio has 12 percent longer wheelbase distance than MG TF I Cabrio 1.8 116HP. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio 6.2 i V12 48V 580HP manual 4x4 should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
6

Length

4,578 > 3,936 mm
The Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio is 16 percent longer when compared to the MG. The length of the car is important in respect of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Lamborghini probably will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Lamborghini will be better driven ,however, the MG TF I will be a slightly easier for parking because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,695 > 1,412 mm
3

Price range

supersport > popular
0

Front track

1,632 > 1,400 mm

MG

3 reasons for MG TF I Cabrio 1.8 116KM in comparison to Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio 6.2 i V12 48V 580HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

211 > 140 l
With more trunk space the MG will have much more room for carrying things and be more functional vehicle than the Lamborghini. If the capacity of the boot is what does appeal to you, the MG will be better choice as it is around 51 % larger than the trunk of its rival.
1

Model release date

2002 > 2001
The difference in debut day between presented cars is only 1 year, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a blistering pace and for that reason the MG TF I may feature more advanced solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
1

Height

1,260 > 1,004 mm
Those drivers who value more functional driving a car and want to have higher position at the steering wheel we would encourage to pick the MG TF I Cabrio. However to those who enjoy sporting driving the Lamborghini Murcielago probably would be a better pick. The difference in height between presented vehicles equals to 256 millimeters. The average medium height in S segment, in which the producer MG is classified, is of around 1,303 mm and the MG is lower by 3 percent than the average.

Cars specifications

Lamborghini Murcielago Cabrio 6.2 i V12 48V 580HP manual 4x4 MG TF I Cabrio 1.8 116HP
    Price range supersport popular
    Model release date 2001 2002
    Facelifting no no
    Class S S
    Payload 2,000 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK