The horsepower of the Lancia Delta III Hatchback is 11 percent grater when compared to the Nissan. As the difference is little this should not affect the car performance largely.
The fuel economy is distinctly to Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP manual's advantage. This vehicle uses 28 % fewer fuel in the combined cycle than the Nissan Tiida. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the compact segment, in which the Lancia Delta III is classified, is 6.8 l while the Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP manual needs by 18 percent less fuel than the average.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
A small difference in the amount of 12 % shows that the Nissan is the worst car of these two presented. In the „C segment, being represented by the Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual, the average acceleration is 11.3 s and is by 8 percent lower than this of Nissan vehicle.
The Lancia Delta III Hatchback features 82 l
more capable luggage compartment
than the Nissan Tiida.
Such a difference is big
therefore it will distinctly matters in terms
of the comfort of the
car’s usage. At the same time that
the Lancia has
boot capacity than the average in the
same class. Roomy
trunk will be useful during family
journeys as well as while
everyday car’s usage.
The top speed possible to be reached by the Lancia Delta III Hatchback is greater compared with the Nissan by 4, which allows the Lancia Delta III Hatchback to overcome quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 8 km/h is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
distance between left and right side of a car affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability on road. The Lancia Delta III Hatchback is widther only by 102 millimeters compared with the Nissan and is not really important. The average for the „compact” segment amounts to around 1,703 mm and is by 6 % smaller than the width of the Lancia.
The Nissan Tiida Hatchback is worst that the Lancia Delta III in the aspect of fuel tank capacity. The Lancia Delta III Hatchback is able to store by 12 percent more fuel in comparison to the Nissan.
The wheelbase of a car is the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of better car's weight distribution. Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP manual has 4 % longer wheelbase distance when compared to Nissan Tiida. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
The Lancia Delta III Hatchback is 5 percent longer in comparison to the Nissan Tiida Hatchback. Long cars more of passenger space and usually provide more storage space. While the Lancia Delta III seems to be better option for families or drivers who value comfortable driving, the Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual may be more appropriate to the young because it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
Model release date
The difference in release date between these two vehicles is only 4 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a staggering pace and for that reason the Lancia Delta III may have more modern technologies thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.