Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP manual vs Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual

Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Matthias All Rights Released into the public domain

16 reasons for

Lancia Delta III Hatchback, model available from 2008.
It has 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

3 reasons for

Nissan Tiida Hatchback, model available from 2004.
It has 1.8 i 126HP petrol engine produced from 2004 to 2009.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual
Lancia

16 reasons for Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140KM manual in comparison to Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

140 > 126 hp
The horsepower of the Lancia Delta III Hatchback is 11 percent grater when compared to the Nissan. As the difference is little this should not affect the car performance largely.
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 7.8 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP manual's advantage. This vehicle uses 28 % fewer fuel in the combined cycle than the Nissan Tiida. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the compact segment, in which the Lancia Delta III is classified, is 6.8 l while the Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP manual needs by 18 percent less fuel than the average.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.2 > 10.4 s
A small difference in the amount of 12 % shows that the Nissan is the worst car of these two presented. In the „C segment, being represented by the Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual, the average acceleration is 11.3 s and is by 8 percent lower than this of Nissan vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

382 > 300 l
The Lancia Delta III Hatchback features 82 l more capable luggage compartment than the Nissan Tiida. Such a difference is big therefore it will distinctly matters in terms of the comfort of the car’s usage. At the same time that the Lancia has 11 liters bigger boot capacity than the average in the same class. Roomy trunk will be useful during family journeys as well as while everyday car’s usage.
33

Top speed

203 > 195 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the ​​Lancia Delta III Hatchback is greater compared with the Nissan by 4, which allows the Lancia Delta III Hatchback to overcome quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 8 km/h is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,802 > 1,700 mm
distance between left and right side of a car affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability on road. The Lancia Delta III Hatchback is widther only by 102 millimeters compared with the Nissan and is not really important. The average for the „compact” segment amounts to around 1,703 mm and is by 6 % smaller than the width of the Lancia.
19

Range

1,018 > 667 km
19

Fuel tank

57 > 51 l
The Nissan Tiida Hatchback is worst that the Lancia Delta III in the aspect of fuel tank capacity. The Lancia Delta III Hatchback is able to store by 12 percent more fuel in comparison to the Nissan.
15

Wheelbase

2,700 > 2,604 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of better car's weight distribution. Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP manual has 4 % longer wheelbase distance when compared to Nissan Tiida. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
6

Length

4,516 > 4,294 mm
The Lancia Delta III Hatchback is 5 percent longer in comparison to the Nissan Tiida Hatchback. Long cars more of passenger space and usually provide more storage space. While the Lancia Delta III seems to be better option for families or drivers who value comfortable driving, the Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual may be more appropriate to the young because it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2008 > 2004
The difference in release date between these two vehicles is only 4 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a staggering pace and for that reason the Lancia Delta III may have more modern technologies thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
1

Tire width

205 > 195 mm
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 65 %
0

Curb weight

1,320 > 1,232 kg

Nissan

3 reasons for Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126KM manual in comparison to Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP manual

Reasons for
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

467 > 463 l
8

Engine capacity

1,798 > 1,367 cc
The Nissan has 32 percent larger engine capacity when compared to the Lancia. The difference is considerable. For this reason the Nissan Tiida Hatchback should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine size usually equals worst fuel consumption.
1

Height

1,534 > 1,499 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Nissan Tiida Hatchback, which is by 2 % higher than the Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP manual, is appropriate choice for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.

Cars specifications

Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP manual Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2008 2004
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
    Payload - 1,732 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK