Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP manual vs Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Matthias All Rights Released into the public domain

Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

16 reasons for

Lancia Delta III Hatchback, model available from 2008.
It has 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

3 reasons for

Nissan Tiida Hatchback, model available from 2004.
It has 1.8 i 126HP petrol engine produced from 2004 to 2009.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

16 reasons for Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140KM manual in comparison to Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual

Reasons for

135

Maximal power

140 > 126 hp

The horsepower of the Lancia Delta III Hatchback is 11 percent grater when compared to the Nissan. As the difference is little this should not affect the car performance largely.

Add a comment

112

Average consumption

5.6 > 7.8 l

The fuel economy is distinctly to Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP manual's advantage. This vehicle uses 28 % fewer fuel in the combined cycle than the Nissan Tiida. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the compact segment, in which the Lancia Delta III is classified, is 6.8 l while the Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP manual needs by 18 percent less fuel than the average.

Add a comment

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.2 > 10.4 s

A small difference in the amount of 12 % shows that the Nissan is the worst car of these two presented. In the „C segment, being represented by the Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual, the average acceleration is 11.3 s and is by 8 percent lower than this of Nissan vehicle.

Add a comment

Trunk capacity

382 > 300 l

The Lancia Delta III Hatchback features 82 l more capable luggage compartment than the Nissan Tiida. Such a difference is big therefore it will distinctly matters in terms of the comfort of the car’s usage. At the same time that the Lancia has 11 liters bigger boot capacity than the average in the same class. Roomy trunk will be useful during family journeys as well as while everyday car’s usage.

Add a comment

Top speed

203 > 195 km/h

The top speed possible to be reached by the Lancia Delta III Hatchback is greater compared with the Nissan by 4, which allows the Lancia Delta III Hatchback to overcome quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 8 km/h is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.

Add a comment

Width

1,802 > 1,700 mm

distance between left and right side of a car affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability on road. The Lancia Delta III Hatchback is widther only by 102 millimeters compared with the Nissan and is not really important. The average for the „compact” segment amounts to around 1,703 mm and is by 6 % smaller than the width of the Lancia.

Add a comment

Range

1,018 > 667 km

Add a comment

Fuel tank

57 > 51 l

The Nissan Tiida Hatchback is worst that the Lancia Delta III in the aspect of fuel tank capacity. The Lancia Delta III Hatchback is able to store by 12 percent more fuel in comparison to the Nissan.

Add a comment

Wheelbase

2,700 > 2,604 mm

The wheelbase of a car is the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of better car's weight distribution. Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP manual has 4 % longer wheelbase distance when compared to Nissan Tiida. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.

Add a comment

Length

4,516 > 4,294 mm

The Lancia Delta III Hatchback is 5 percent longer in comparison to the Nissan Tiida Hatchback. Long cars more of passenger space and usually provide more storage space. While the Lancia Delta III seems to be better option for families or drivers who value comfortable driving, the Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual may be more appropriate to the young because it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.

Add a comment

Price range

luxury > popular

Add a comment

Model release date

2008 > 2004

The difference in release date between these two vehicles is only 4 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a staggering pace and for that reason the Lancia Delta III may have more modern technologies thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.

Add a comment

Tire width

205 > 195 mm

Add a comment

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″

Add a comment

Tire profile

55 > 65 %

Add a comment

Curb weight

1,320 > 1,232 kg

Add a comment

Reasons for

Trunk capacity with seats down

467 > 463 l

Add a comment

Engine capacity

1,798 > 1,367 cc

The Nissan has 32 percent larger engine capacity when compared to the Lancia. The difference is considerable. For this reason the Nissan Tiida Hatchback should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine size usually equals worst fuel consumption.

Add a comment

Height

1,534 > 1,499 mm

If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Nissan Tiida Hatchback, which is by 2 % higher than the Lancia Delta III Hatchback 1.4 MultiAir 16V 140HP manual, is appropriate choice for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.

Add a comment