Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual vs Land Rover Freelander I Hard Top 1.8 i 16V 117HP manual 4x4

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Kickaffe Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

15 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Land Rover Freelander I Hard Top, model available from 1998 to 2006.
It has 1.8 i 16V 117HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2006.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Land Rover Freelander I Hard Top 1.8 i 16V 117HP manual 4x4
Nissan

15 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to Land Rover Freelander I Hard Top 1.8 i 16V 117HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
54

Urban consumption

6.9 > 12.7 l
The Nissan Qashqai II uses 5.8 l fewer gasoline running around the town when compared to the Land Rover Freelander I Hard Top. The difference at the level of 46 percent is really perceptible in everyday use of the car. But, in a long term it will even bring you significant savings. Remember that fuel consumption may change depending on your driving style
47

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.3 > 12.6 s
The Land Rover Freelander I Hard Top is relatively slower compared to the Nissan Qashqai II. The difference in the amount of 1.3 s is not really significant and it should not be substantially taken by you into as important when choosing one of presented vehicles.
36

Trunk capacity

438 > 312 l
The Nissan Qashqai II features 126 liters bigger boot in relation to the Land Rover Freelander I Hard Top. Such a difference is quite big and it will is relevant to the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. At the same time that the Nissan has 7 l bigger trunk size than the average in its class. Larger trunk will be useful during family journeys as well as while daily car’s usage.
28

Top speed

183 > 165 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Nissan is higher in comparison to this of the Land Rover Freelander I Hard Top which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 11 % is little and is not realy noticable in daily driving.
16

Wheelbase

2,644 > 2,547 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of better vehicle's weight distribution. Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual has 4 percent longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Land Rover. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Nissan Qashqai II should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
12

Urban range

797 > 465 km
9

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Nissan has a one additional speed compared to the Land Rover. Sometimes the extra speed is used as an overdrive so that the previous speeds can be shorter in order to give increased acceleration in the lower speeds. One more speed as well have an effect on decreasing fuel consumption and CO2 emission.
3

Rear track

1,563 > 1,542 mm
2

Model release date

2014 > 1998
2

Tire width

215 > 195 mm
1

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no question that the five-door Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is more usable and if you frequently drive with more than one people then it’s the format to go for. The biggest advantage of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the back but it’s as well easier to put luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Land Rover Freelander I Hard Top 1.8 i 16V 117HP manual 4x4 generally look more dynamic and sporty and for young drivers who don’t often have passengers in the back seat the Land Rover Freelander I may be more appropriate.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 5,500 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,564 > 1,534 mm
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

65 > 80 %

Land Rover

10 reasons for Land Rover Freelander I Hard Top 1.8 i 16V 117KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
138

Maximal power

117 > 115 hp
The horsepower is a feature that majority of car fans pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Land Rover Freelander I that has by 2 percent horsepower more than the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual, which makes this car slightly faster. Because of more horsepower the Land Rover Freelander I should as well give somewhat better flexiblility in specific gears.
20

Width

1,809 > 1,800 mm
Distance between two sides of a car affects interior space for travelers as well as stability during driving. The width of the Land Rover Freelander I Hard Top is larger only by 1 percent in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II and is not really worth considering. The average for the „compact SUV” segment is around 1,797 millimeters and is by 12 mm smaller than the same attribute of the Land Rover Freelander I Hard Top 1.8 i 16V 117HP manual 4x4.
20

Fuel tank

59 > 54 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Land Rover Freelander I which can comprise 5 l more fuel in comparison to the Nissan. The medium fuel container capacity in the compact SUV segment, from which the Land Rover comes from, amounts to 61 l, whereas in compact SUV segment (represented by the Nissan Qashqai II) it equals 61 liters.
9

Length

4,393 > 4,380 mm
The Land Rover Freelander I Hard Top is 13 millimeters longer in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II. Long cars have roomy cabin and also have plenty of trunk space. Although the Land Rover Freelander I Hard Top occurs to be better pick for families or those who value comfortable driving, the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual may be more appropriate to singles because it will not make troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
7

Maximum load capacity

610 > 542 kg
4

Engine capacity

1,795 > 1,198 cc
The Land Rover Freelander I has 597 cc greater engine displacement in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II. The difference is relatively considerable. Consequently the Land Rover Freelander I should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand greater engine size equals worst fuel consumption.
2

Height

1,708 > 1,590 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater possibility of loading massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars of 118 mm to the advantage of the Land Rover Freelander I is small and does not matter much.
2

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Payload

2,040 > 1,860 kg
0

Curb weight

1,425 > 1,314 kg

Cars specifications

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual Land Rover Freelander I Hard Top 1.8 i 16V 117HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,199 kg -
    Model release date 2014 1998
    Price range popular luxury
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK