Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual

Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org OSX All Rights Released into the public domain

23 reasons for

Land Rover Freelander II, model available from 2006.
It has 2.0 Si4 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Peugeot 2008, model available from 2013.
It has 1.2 VTi 82HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual
Land Rover

23 reasons for Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

240 > 82 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that most of drivers attach the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Land Rover, that has by 158 more horsepower in relation to the Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual, which makes this vehicle distinctly better in terms of top speed. Having more horsepower the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 will as well give considerably more flexiblility in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

338 > 117 Nm
The difference of 189 % is really huge which cause that the Land Rover Freelander II features much more better flexibility of the engine, it reaches high speed significantly faster and has better towing power.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.6 > 13.5 s
The Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 speeds up to 100k\h by 4.9 s quicker in relation to the Peugeot. A noticable difference in acceleration in favor of the Land Rover will allow him to overtake much quicker and avoid other obstacles.
38

Trunk capacity

754 > 350 l
The boot of the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 is 115 percent more spacious than the Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Land Rover Freelander II will be much more convenient. The larger the trunk, the more baggage you can take.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,671 > 1,196 l
33

Top speed

200 > 169 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Land Rover Freelander II is greater in comparison to this of the Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 18 % is not big and is imperceptible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,750 > 2,745 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower value of rotations at which the maximum torque is reached has an impact on an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. Still, in order to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is always worth to see a torque performance graph.
15

Wheelbase

2,655 > 2,548 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more appropriate car's weight distribution. Land Rover has 107 millimeters longer wheelbase distance when compared to Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Land Rover Freelander II should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
11

Trunk length with seats up

913 > 752 mm
9

Ground clearance

209 > 166 mm
Ground clearance is a vital factor in many relevant features of a vehicle. Ride height is the most important for off-road cars still all cars appreciate the higher suspension. The Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 has 43 mm higher clearance when compared with the Peugeot. In addition to easier mobility in rough terrain, the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 will also be easier to overcome city obstacles like high curbs, for example.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,200 cc
The Land Rover Freelander II has 798 cubic centimeters greater engine size in relation to the Peugeot 2008. The difference is notable. As a result the Land Rover should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand bigger cubic capacity usually affects worst fuel economy.
6

Length

4,500 > 4,159 mm
The Land Rover is 8 percent longer in relation to the Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual. Long cars are more spacious and also have more storage space. Although the Land Rover occurs to be better option for families or those who value convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Peugeot may be more appropriate to women because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,625 > 1,487 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,740 > 1,558 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of loading massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 12 percent to the advantage of the Land Rover is not big and should not be really noticeable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For drivers who opt for more convenient use of a car and who don’t want to struggle with complications that stems from the stick shift we recommend cars with automatic transmission. To those who have a flair for sport driving a manual gearbox might be better as it gives a control of rmp range in which a shift take place.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 5,750 revolutions/minute
0

Trunk height

883 > 514 mm
0

Front track

1,608 > 1,480 mm
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,191 > 2,001 mm
0

Curb weight

1,778 > 1,046 kg
Advantages

Land Rover City Car

Mazda/Ford

Peugeot

4 reasons for Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82KM manual in comparison to Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

4.9 > 9.4 l
The Peugeot 2008 burns up 48 percent less fuel in the mixed cycle than the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4. The difference in the amount of 48 % will be very appreciable in day-to-day usage of the vehicle. In the long term it can generate a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

6 > 13.3 l
The Peugeot 2008 uses 55 % less fuel in city traffic than the Land Rover Freelander II. The difference at the level of 7.3 l is very significant in daily using vehicle. Additionally, within many months it will generate real and noticeable cost savings. Moreover you shoule take int consideration that estimated results of the average fuel consumption might be considerably raised if you ride dynamically. The difference in fuel economy of the vehicles compared by you is so colossal that you should consider to choose vehicles with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.5 > 7.5 l
1

Model release date

2013 > 2006
Production of the older car began much more earlier than Land Rover Freelander II and for this reason it seems to be right to assume that this car has significantly less modern solutions used.

Cars specifications

Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 2,003 kg -
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2006 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK