Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Ssangyong Korando III SUV 2.0i 150HP manual

Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org OSX All Rights Released into the public domain

18 reasons for

Land Rover Freelander II, model available from 2006.
It has 2.0 Si4 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Ssangyong Korando III SUV, model available from 2010.
It has 2.0i 150HP petrol engine produced from 2012 to 2013.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Ssangyong Korando III SUV 2.0i 150HP manual
Land Rover

18 reasons for Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Ssangyong Korando III SUV 2.0i 150HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

240 > 150 hp
The Land Rover Freelander II comes with petrol which makes by 90 more horsepower than the the engine of the Ssangyong Korando III SUV, transforming the car to a more sporty character. It seems to be better choice to those who want to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

338 > 189 Nm
Thanks to 149 Nm higher torque, the engine of the Land Rover Freelander II does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Ssangyong Korando III. This, in turn, have positive implications for acceleration.
38

Trunk capacity

754 > 485 l
With more boot size the Land Rover will have much more room for carrying things and be more functional vehicle than the Ssangyong Korando III. If the size of the boot is important to you, the Land Rover will be better to choose because it is about 269 liters more spacious than the boot of its rival.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,671 > 1,314 l
33

Top speed

200 > 163 km/h
The maximum velocity of the ​​Land Rover Freelander II is greater than the Ssangyong Korando III SUV 2.0i 150HP manual by 37 kilometers/hour, which allows the Land Rover to overcome faster long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 23 % is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,750 > 4,000 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is produced clearly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is this of the Land Rover Freelander II. The engine of the Ssangyong Korando III achieves its full efficiency at 4,000 revolutions per minute which is by 2,250 revolutions per minute lower compared with the Land Rover Freelander II.
15

Wheelbase

2,655 > 2,640 mm
Land Rover Freelander II has 1 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to the Ssangyong Korando III SUV 2.0i 150HP manual. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. But, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
9

Ground clearance

209 > 178 mm
Ground clearance is a vital factor in several important features of a vehicle. Ride height is the most important in off-road cars still all vehicles appreciate the higher suspension. The Land Rover Freelander II has 31 mm higher clearance in relation to the Ssangyong. In addition to easier mobility in rough terrain, the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as large kerbstones, for example.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,997 cc
The Land Rover has by 1 cubic centimeter larger engine displacement when compared to the Ssangyong. This play a little role as far as acceleration is concerned, as both figures does not differ much.
8

Gross trailer weight

2,003 > 1,500 kg
6

Length

4,500 > 4,406 mm
The Land Rover Freelander II is 94 mm longer when compared to the Ssangyong Korando III SUV. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and usually have bigger trunk. Although the Land Rover Freelander II occurs to be better pick for families or those who love the idea of comfortable rides, the Ssangyong Korando III SUV may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,625 > 1,558 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,740 > 1,676 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Land Rover Freelander II, which is by 4 percent higher than the Ssangyong, is better option for you. However, compared cars do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
A manual transmission that is placed in the Ssangyong Korando III SUV is more simpler built and is cheaper in usage but also it is less comfortable because there is no need to work with the clutch and shift speeds very often, especialy in a in rush hour in city traffic where we have lots of stop and go conditions. An automatic transmission in the Land Rover with 6 – speeds transmission is in our opinion better to use.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,608 > 1,573 mm
0

Curb weight

1,778 > 1,537 kg

Ssangyong

4 reasons for Ssangyong Korando III SUV 2.0i 150KM manual in comparison to Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

7.7 > 9.4 l
The Ssangyong Korando III SUV burns up 1.7 l less in the combined cycle than the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4. The difference at the level of 1.7 l is not realy noticeable. Nevertheless within some time it would give a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

9.7 > 13.3 l
The Ssangyong Korando III burns 3.6 l fewer fuel in city traffic compared with the Land Rover Freelander II. The difference at the level of 3.6 l is quite significant in use of car. Additionally, during many months it may give gigantic cost savings. Moreover you shoule take int consideration that medium results of the average fuel efficiency may be considerably increased if you ride dynamically. The difference in fuel economy of the vehicles compared by you is so huge that you should consider to choose cars with similar engines. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
24

Extra-urban consumption

6.4 > 7.5 l
1

Model release date

2010 > 2006
Because of the fact that the Land Rover Freelander II's production began only 4 years before the Ssangyong Korando III SUV, the gap between technology used in both vehicles is not really huge, however, the Ssangyong Korando III might have slightly more advanced solutions used in it.

Cars specifications

Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 Ssangyong Korando III SUV 2.0i 150HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 2,003 kg 1,500 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2006 2010
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK