The Land Rover Freelander II comes with petrol which makes by 90 more horsepower than the the engine of the Ssangyong Korando III SUV, transforming the car to a more sporty character. It seems to be better choice to those who want to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
Thanks to 149 Nm higher torque, the engine of the Land Rover Freelander II does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Ssangyong Korando III. This, in turn, have positive implications for acceleration.
With more boot size the Land Rover will have much more room for carrying things and be more functional vehicle than the Ssangyong Korando III. If the size of the boot is important to you, the Land Rover will be better to choose because it is about 269 liters more spacious than the boot of its rival.
Trunk capacity with seats down
The maximum velocity of the Land Rover Freelander II is greater than the Ssangyong Korando III SUV 2.0i 150HP manual by 37 kilometers/hour, which allows the Land Rover to overcome faster long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 23 % is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
Maximal torque RPM
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is produced clearly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is this of the Land Rover Freelander II. The engine of the Ssangyong Korando III achieves its full efficiency at 4,000 revolutions per minute which is by 2,250 revolutions per minute lower compared with the Land Rover Freelander II.
Land Rover Freelander II has 1 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to the Ssangyong Korando III SUV 2.0i 150HP manual. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. But, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
Ground clearance is a vital factor in several important features of a vehicle. Ride height is the most important in off-road cars still all vehicles appreciate the higher suspension. The Land Rover Freelander II has 31 mm higher clearance in relation to the Ssangyong. In addition to easier mobility in rough terrain, the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as large kerbstones, for example.
The Land Rover has by 1 cubic centimeter larger engine displacement when compared to the Ssangyong. This play a little role as far as acceleration is concerned, as both figures does not differ much.
Gross trailer weight
The Land Rover Freelander II is 94 mm longer when compared to the Ssangyong Korando III SUV. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and usually have bigger trunk. Although the Land Rover Freelander II occurs to be better pick for families or those who love the idea of comfortable rides, the Ssangyong Korando III SUV may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Land Rover Freelander II, which is by 4 percent higher than the Ssangyong, is better option for you. However, compared cars do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.
A manual transmission that is placed in the Ssangyong Korando III SUV is more simpler built and is cheaper in usage but also it is less comfortable because there is no need to work with the clutch and shift speeds very often, especialy in a in rush hour in city traffic where we have lots of stop and go conditions. An automatic transmission in the Land Rover with 6 – speeds transmission is in our opinion better to use.