Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

12 reasons for

Subaru Forester IV, model available from 2013.
It has 2.0 XT 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic gearbox.

10 reasons for

Land Rover Freelander II, model available from 2006.
It has 2.0 Si4 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4
Subaru

12 reasons for Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

8.3 > 9.4 l
The Subaru consumes 1.1 l fewer fuel in the mixed cycle when compared to the Land Rover Freelander II. The Subaru Forester IV, which is classified in „compact SUV” segment burns up by 0.8 l more amount of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 7.5 l.
59

Maximal torque

350 > 338 Nm
The Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 has 4 % more torque than the Land Rover. Even though a large number of drivers do not appreciate the maximum torque when buying a vehicle, it describes the best how a car is speeding up. As far as these two vehicles are concerned the difference is quite small and for that reason the difference will not be much noticeable.
56

Urban consumption

11.2 > 13.3 l
The Subaru Forester IV burns up 16 % less petrol in the city compared to the Land Rover. The Subaru Forester IV, which comes from small off-road 4x4 class, uses 1.6 l fewer petrol. It is also worth to know that average fuel consumption in the urban for the compact SUV class equals to 9.6 l, whereas the Subaru Forester IV uses by 17 % more fuel than the average.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.5 > 8.6 s
A little difference at the level of 13 % indicates that the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 is insignificantly beaten in this confrontation. In the „mini 4x4” segment, to which the Land Rover is assigned, the medium acceleration amounts to 10.9 s and is by 2.3 s slower than acceleration of Land Rover’s car.
33

Top speed

221 > 200 km/h
The top speed of the ​​Subaru is greater than the Land Rover Freelander II by 21 km/h, which allows the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 to cover faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 21 kilometers/hour is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
24

Extra-urban consumption

7 > 7.5 l
9

Ground clearance

220 > 209 mm
Ground clearance is defined as the space between the vehicle underbody and the ground. taking these two cars into consideration, it is the Subaru Forester IV that has 11 mm higher ride height when compared with the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4. For this reason the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 will deal better with rough terrain and obstacles in the city. However, the higher ground clearance equals a higher center of gravity, which can adversely influence the handling of the Subaru.
8

Engine capacity

1,999 > 1,998 cc
The Subaru has by 1 cubic centimeter greater engine size in comparison to the Land Rover Freelander II. This play a little role when it comes to accleration, as both figures does not differ much.
6

Length

4,596 > 4,500 mm
The Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 is 96 mm longer in relation to the Land Rover Freelander II. The length of the car plays a role in respect of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Subaru Forester IV very likely will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Subaru will be better driven ,however, the Land Rover Freelander II will be a bit easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
4

Cylinder layout

boxer > inline
A Boxer installed in the Subaru occurs to be noticeably better because it can be shorter and lighter and creates less vibrations compared to straight engine. Moreover bear in mind that its horizontal layout results in that a car has the benefit of a lower center of gravity what affects the better grip. The advantage of engine which cylinders are arranged in a line, like the one placed in the Land Rover, is that due to its simple construction it can be cheaper compared to other types of engines.
1

Model release date

2013 > 2006
Manufacture of the older car commenced 7 years prior to its contender hence it seems to be right to assume that this car features significantly less advanced parts applied.
0

Maximal roof load

80 > 75 kg

Land Rover

10 reasons for Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

754 > 505 l
With more luggage capacity the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 will have much more room for transporting things and be more functional one compared with the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4. If the capacity of the boot is what does appeal to you, the Land Rover Freelander II will be better choice as it is about 249 liters more spacious than the boot of its rival.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,671 > 1,579 l
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,750 > 2,400 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower number of rotations at which the highest torque is reached has an impact on an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. However, in order to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is recommended to see a torque performance graph.
15

Wheelbase

2,655 > 2,634 mm
The Land Rover has 21 millimeters longer wheelbase than Subaru. Therefore the Land Rover Freelander II is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
8

Gross trailer weight

2,003 > 1,996 kg
4

Rear track

1,625 > 1,547 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 5,600 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,608 > 1,545 mm
0

Curb weight

1,778 > 1,615 kg

Cars specifications

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,996 kg 2,003 kg
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 2013 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK