Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.3 100HP manual

Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org OSX All Rights Released into the public domain

14 reasons for

Land Rover Freelander II, model available from 2006.
It has 2.0 Si4 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

2 reasons for

Toyota Urban Cruiser, model available from 2009 to 2012.
It has 1.3 100HP petrol engine produced from 2009 to 2011.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.3 100HP manual
Land Rover

14 reasons for Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.3 100HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

240 > 100 hp
The Toyota significantly loses with the Land Rover Freelander II in the field of amount of horses under the hood having them by 140 percent less. As a result the engine installed in the Land Rover, as opposed to the Toyota, produces relatively lots of power and impersive acceleration.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.6 > 12.5 s
If a dynamic driving is what you realy like, the Land Rover Freelander II will appeal to you as it’s acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is 3.9 s faster than the Toyota Urban Cruiser.
38

Trunk capacity

754 > 314 l
The trunk of the Land Rover is 440 liters more spacious in relation to the Toyota Urban Cruiser. It is perceptible difference so, in this category the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 will be much more practical. The larger the trunk, the more luggage you can take with you on a journey.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,671 > 747 l
33

Top speed

200 > 175 km/h
The top velocity of the Land Rover is higher as compared to this of the Toyota which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 14 percent is little and is not realy noticable in everyday use.
15

Wheelbase

2,655 > 2,458 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of better car's weight distribution. Land Rover Freelander II has 8 % longer wheelbase distance in relation to Toyota. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Land Rover Freelander II should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,329 cc
The Land Rover Freelander II has 669 cubic centimeters greater cubic capacity when compared to the Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.3 100HP manual. The difference is large. For this reason the Land Rover Freelander II should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand greater engine displacement usually equals worst fuel efficiency.
6

Length

4,500 > 3,932 mm
The Land Rover is 568 millimeters longer in relation to the Toyota Urban Cruiser. Long cars have roomy cabin and in most cases have more storage space. Although the Land Rover Freelander II seems to be better pick for families or those who appreciate convenient driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Toyota Urban Cruiser may be more appropriate to city drivers as it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,625 > 1,490 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,740 > 1,525 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater capacity of loading big amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 215 millimeters in favor of the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 is insignificant and does not matter much.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
A stick shift that is placed in the Toyota Urban Cruiser is more simpler built and is cheaper in usage, however, also it is less comfortable because there is no need to operate clutch and change speeds and it can be lot of inconvenience in a congested city traffic where drivers have lots of stop and go situations. An automatic transmission which is in the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 with 6 – speeds gearbox is in our opinion better choice.
0

Front track

1,608 > 1,485 mm
0

Curb weight

1,778 > 1,123 kg

Toyota

2 reasons for Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.3 100KM manual in comparison to Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.5 > 9.4 l
The Toyota Urban Cruiser burns up 42 % less amount of fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4. The difference in the amount of 42 % will be quite realy noticeable in everyday usage of the car. In the long term it would give a real savings.
1

Model release date

2009 > 2006
The difference in debut day between compared vehicles is only 3 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a staggering pace and for that reason the Toyota may feature more modern solutionswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.

Cars specifications

Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.3 100HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 2,003 kg -
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2006 2009
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK