The Toyota significantly loses with the Land Rover Freelander II in the field of amount of horses under the hood having them by 140 percent less. As a result the engine installed in the Land Rover, as opposed to the Toyota, produces relatively lots of power and impersive acceleration.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
If a dynamic driving is what you realy like, the Land Rover Freelander II will appeal to you as it’s
acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is
the Toyota Urban Cruiser.
The trunk of the Land Rover is 440 liters more spacious in relation to the Toyota Urban Cruiser. It is perceptible difference so, in this category the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 will be much more practical. The larger the trunk, the more luggage you can take with you on a journey.
Trunk capacity with seats down
The top velocity of the Land Rover is higher as compared to this of the Toyota which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 14 percent is little and is not realy noticable in everyday use.
The wheelbase of a car equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of better car's weight distribution. Land Rover Freelander II has 8 % longer wheelbase distance in relation to Toyota. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Land Rover Freelander II should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
The Land Rover Freelander II has 669 cubic centimeters greater cubic capacity when compared to the Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.3 100HP manual. The difference is large. For this reason the Land Rover Freelander II should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand greater engine displacement usually equals worst fuel efficiency.
The Land Rover is 568 millimeters longer in relation to the Toyota Urban Cruiser. Long cars have roomy cabin and in most cases have more storage space. Although the Land Rover Freelander II seems to be better pick for families or those who appreciate convenient driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Toyota Urban Cruiser may be more appropriate to city drivers as it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater capacity of loading big amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 215 millimeters in favor of the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 is insignificant and does not matter much.
A stick shift that is placed in the Toyota Urban Cruiser is more simpler built and is cheaper in usage, however, also it is less comfortable because there is no need to operate clutch and change speeds and it can be lot of inconvenience in a congested city traffic where drivers have lots of stop and go situations. An automatic transmission which is in the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 with 6 – speeds gearbox is in our opinion better choice.