Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Kirakiraouji Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

15 reasons for

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 Si4 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Mazda CX-5, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4
Land Rover

15 reasons for Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

240 > 160 hp
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d comes with petrol which makes by 50 percent more horsepower over the the engine of the Mazda, transforming the car to a more dynamic character. It should be better choice to those who would like to experience thrill of drive a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

338 > 207 Nm
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 63 percent more torque when compared to the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4. Even though a large number of drivers do not attach importance the maximum torque when choosing a car, it describes the best how fast a vehicle is speeding up. When it comes to compared vehicles the difference is substantial and for that reason the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 will give you better sensation of driving.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.6 > 10.5 s
If a dynamic driving is what you are really in to, the Land Rover is better for you because it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 28 % faster in relation to the Mazda CX-5.
38

Trunk capacity

575 > 503 l
If you need a vehicles for long cruises, which could load more things in the boot , take the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. The Mazda CX-5 is equiped with by 14 % smaller boot compared with the Mazda so probably you would be able to carry one bag less. Examining the luggage compartment also pay attention to its dimensions which have substantial effect on loading capability .
Add a comment
this makes no since at all
33

Top speed

217 > 197 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the ​​Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is greater in relation to the Mazda by 20 kilometers per hour, which allows the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque to cover quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 20 kilometers/hour is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,750 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is delivered clearly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is this of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4. The engine of the Mazda achieves its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions per minute which is by 2,255 revolutions per minute worst result compared with the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d.
9

Ground clearance

217 > 209 mm
Ground clearance means the minimum distance between the vehicle underbody and the road. When it comes to the two compared cars, it is the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d which has 8 mm higher ride height in relation to the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4. For this reason the Land Rover will cope better with rough terrain and high curbs in the city. However, the higher ride height equals a higher center of gravity, which can negatively affect the handling of the vehicle.
8

Maximum load capacity

710 > 500 kg
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
A manual transmission that is placed in the Mazda CX-5 is more simpler construction and is cheaper in usage but it is less comfortable because the driver has to operate clutch and shift speeds very often, especialy in a bussy urban traffic where drivers have lots of frequent stop and go conditions. An automatic gearbox which is installed in the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d with gears in the amount of 6 – speeds transmission is in our opinion better to use.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,348 > 2,000 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

745 > 726 kg
0

Front track

1,625 > 1,582 mm
0

Curb weight

1,636 > 1,500 kg

Mazda

8 reasons for Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.4 > 8.5 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Mazda's advantage. This vehicle consumes 2.1 l less petrol in the combined cycle compared to the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4. It is also worth to know that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the small off-road 4x4 class, in which the Mazda CX-5 is classified, is 7.5 l whereas the Mazda CX-5 consumes by 15 % less fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

7.9 > 11.7 l
The Mazda CX-5 uses 3.8 l less fuel while driving inside city in comparison to the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4. The difference in the amount of 3.8 l is quite significant in daily usage of the vehicle. What is more, in a long term it will even give you significant savings. Bear in mind that fuel consumption may vary depending on how you drive
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,622 > 1,447 l
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.8 > 6.9 l
15

Wheelbase

2,700 > 2,667 mm
Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 has 33 millimeters longer wheelbase than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. But, cars with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,803 > 1,796 kg
6

Length

4,537 > 4,365 mm
The Mazda is 172 mm longer in comparison to the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Long vehicles have more interior space and usually provide more storage space. While the Mazda occurs to be better for families or persons who love the idea of convenient rides, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 may be more appropriate to the young because it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
1

Height

1,668 > 1,635 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Mazda CX-5, which is by 33 millimeters higher than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, is appropriate option for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much in its height and it should not be much observable.

Cars specifications

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,796 kg 1,803 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2011 2011
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK