Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Kirakiraouji Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

20 reasons for

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 Si4 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Mitsubishi ASX SUV, model available from 2010.
It has 1.6 MIVEC 117HP petrol engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual
Land Rover

20 reasons for Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Reasons for
138

Maximal power

240 > 117 hp
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 123 hp more horsepower than Mitsubishi ASX. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque will be distinctly quicker speed up thanks to grater power. Also leaving behind cars or obstacles should be a piece of cake for the Land Rover equipped with stronger motor.
59

Maximal torque

338 > 152 Nm
When you push the gas pedal and you start speeding up fast, that’s torque you’re feeling. And you will feel it better driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque as it has by 186 Nm more torque in comparison to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV. Presented vehicles vary so much that only riding the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque you will have a pleasurable sensations of getting pushed back in the seat as the car accelerate.
47

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.6 > 11.4 s
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque speeds up to 100k\h by 33 percent faster in comparison to the Mitsubishi. A significant difference in acceleration in favor of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque will allow him to overtake much faster and avoid other obstacles.
36

Trunk capacity

575 > 418 l
With more trunk space the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque will have much more room for loading things and be more usefull vehicle compared with the Mitsubishi. If the size of the luggage compartment is important to you, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 will be better to choose because it is around 38 percent larger than the boot of its competitor.
29

Maximal torque RPM

1,750 > 3,995 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rotations per minute at which the maximum torque is delivered clearly indicates that the winner is is the one of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d. The engine of the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual achieves its full efficiency at 3,995 revolutions/minute which is by 56 percent lower than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
28

Top speed

217 > 183 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 is greater as compared to this of the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 34 kilometers/hour is small and is not realy noticable in daily use.
9

Length

4,365 > 4,296 mm
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 is 2 percent longer than the Mitsubishi. Long cars more of passenger space and in most cases have bigger trunk. While the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque seems to be better choice for families or persons who value soft, smooth long-distance rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mitsubishi ASX SUV may be more appropriate to city drivers as it will not cause problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
9

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Land Rover has only one additional speed than the Mitsubishi ASX. Usually this extra gear is a very tall one so that the previous gears can be shorter to allow increased performance in the lower speeds. One more gear also helps to decrease fuel consumption and CO2 output.
8

Ground clearance

217 > 171 mm
Ground clearance is defined as the space between the car body and the road. As for these two cars, it is the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque which has 46 millimeters higher ride height when compared with the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. This is why the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque will cope better with rough terrain and high curbs in the city. There is olso one minus - the higher ride height equals a higher center of gravity, which can adversely influence the handling of the Land Rover.
7

Maximum load capacity

710 > 625 kg
7

Gross trailer weight

1,796 > 1,102 kg
4

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,589 cc
The engine capacity of the Land Rover is by 409 cubic centimeters larger in relation to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. In a consequence the Mitsubishi will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 will be of better performance, running more smoothly and more durable.
2

Model release date

2011 > 2010
Given that the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual's production started only 1 year before the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d, the distance in technology used in both cars is not really big, however, the Land Rover may have a bit more advanced solutions applied in it.
2

Price range

luxury > popular
2

Height

1,635 > 1,615 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d, which is by 20 millimeters higher than the Mitsubishi ASX, would be appropriate choice for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic transmission which is in the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque despite having a few disadvantages offers much more better comfort of driving. After a long time spent at the steering wheel the driver is less tired. Moreover automatic puts less strain on the engine because of the factory settings of shifts in specific revs range.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,348 > 1,869 kg
0

Front track

1,625 > 1,525 mm
0

Curb weight

1,636 > 1,240 kg

Mitsubishi

5 reasons for Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117KM manual in comparison to Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
115

Average consumption

6.2 > 8.5 l
The Mitsubishi ASX burns up 2.3 l less amount of fuel in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Land Rover. The difference at the level of 2.3 l will be significant in everyday usage of the vehicle. In the long period of time it will bring you a considerable reduction of costs.
54

Urban consumption

7.8 > 11.7 l
The fuel consumption in the city is distinctly to the Mitsubishi ASX's advantage. This car uses 33 percent fewer fuel in built up area in relation to the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Better fuel econumy means less fuel cost passed on you.
23

Extra-urban consumption

5 > 6.9 l
16

Wheelbase

2,676 > 2,667 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual has 9 mm longer wheelbase distance than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

746 > 745 kg

Cars specifications

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,796 kg 1,102 kg
    Model release date 2011 2010
    Price range luxury popular
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK