Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Kirakiraouji Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

16 reasons for

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 Si4 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV, model available from 2012.
It has 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP petrol engine produced from 2012 to 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual
Land Rover

16 reasons for Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

240 > 147 hp
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 comes with petrol which makes by 93 more horsepower over the Mitsubishi, giving the vehicle a more dynamic character. It should be googd choice to those who want to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

338 > 197 Nm
Thanks to 72 % more torque, the engine of the Land Rover distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Mitsubishi. This, in turn, produces better a car's acceleration.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.6 > 10.8 s
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 accelerates to 100k\h 3.2 s quicker than the Mitsubishi Outlander III. A significant difference in acceleration in favor of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 will allow him to overtake much faster and avoid other obstacles.
33

Top speed

217 > 184 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is greater in relation to the Mitsubishi Outlander III by 18, which allows the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 to overcome quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 33 km/h is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,750 > 4,195 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is produced distinctly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is this of the Land Rover. The engine of the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV reaches its full efficiency at 4,195 revolutions/minute which is by 58 percent worst result than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d has a one extra speed in relation to the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV. Generally this extra gear is a taller one so that the previous gears can be narrower in order to give better acceleration in the lower speeds. One more gear also have an effect on decreasing fuel consumption and CO2 output.
9

Ground clearance

217 > 216 mm
Ground clearance is a critical factor in many important characteristics of a car. It is the most important in off-road vehicles though all cars appreciate the higher suspension. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 has 1 mm larger clearance in relation to the Mitsubishi Outlander III. In addition to easier mobility in rough terrain, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as high kerbstones, for example.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,997 cc
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 has by 1 cubic centimeter greater engine size in comparison to the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV. This may have a little impact when it comes to car's performance, as both values are quite simmilar.
8

Maximum load capacity

710 > 630 kg
8

Gross trailer weight

1,796 > 1,600 kg
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
A manual transmission with which the Mitsubishi Outlander III is equipped is more simpler construction and is cheaper in use but it is less comfortable as the driver has to work with the clutch and shift gears very often, especialy in a congested urban traffic where we have lots of stop and go situations. An automatic transmission in the Land Rover with 6 – speeds gearbox is in our opinion better one.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,348 > 2,065 kg
0

Front track

1,625 > 1,540 mm
0

Curb weight

1,636 > 1,440 kg

Mitsubishi

8 reasons for Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147KM manual in comparison to Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

7.7 > 8.5 l
The Mitsubishi uses 9 % less in the combined cycle than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d. The difference at the level of 0.8 l is not very appreciable. At the same time in the long run it would give a substantial cost reduction.
56

Urban consumption

9.7 > 11.7 l
The Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual uses 2 l fewer fuel while driving inside city than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. The Mitsubishi, that comes from small off-road 4x4 segment, uses 0.1 l less fuel. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the urban for the compact SUV segment equals to 9.6 l, whereas the Mitsubishi burns up by 1 percent more amount of fuel than the average.
24

Extra-urban consumption

6.3 > 6.9 l
15

Wheelbase

2,680 > 2,667 mm
The Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV has 13 millimeters longer wheelbase in comparison to Land Rover. Thanks to this the Mitsubishi Outlander III is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable riding.
6

Length

4,654 > 4,365 mm
The Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual is 289 mm longer than the Land Rover. Long cars have roomy cabin and in most cases provide plenty of trunk space. While the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual occurs to be better choice for families or persons who appreciate convenient driving, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque may be more appropriate to singles because it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
1

Model release date

2012 > 2011
The difference in date of commencement of production between these two cars is only 1 year, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a fast pace what may cause that the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual may feature more advanced technologies thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
1

Height

1,682 > 1,635 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater capacity of putting big amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 3 % to the advantage of the Mitsubishi Outlander III is small and does not matter much.
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

750 > 745 kg

Cars specifications

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,796 kg 1,600 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2011 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK