Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Peugeot 3008 1.6 THP 156HP manual

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Kirakiraouji Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

12 reasons for

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 Si4 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Peugeot 3008, model available from 2009.
It has 1.6 THP 156HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Peugeot 3008 1.6 THP 156HP manual
Land Rover

12 reasons for Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Peugeot 3008 1.6 THP 156HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

240 > 156 hp
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comes with petrol which produce by 84 more horsepower over the Peugeot, giving the vehicle a more sporty character. It should be googd car for drivers who would like to feel thrill of drive a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

338 > 239 Nm
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 has 99 Nm more torque when compared to the Peugeot 3008 1.6 THP 156HP manual. Although most of people do not attach importance the maximum torque when choosing a car, it shows the best how fast a vehicle acclerates. In this case the difference is relevant hence the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque will deliver you better sensation of driving.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.6 > 8.9 s
A small difference amounts to 15 % suggests that the Peugeot 3008 is slightly beaten in this confrontation. In the „compact SUV” segment, to which the Peugeot 3008 is assigned, the average acceleration is 10.9 s and is by 18 % slower than acceleration of Peugeot’s vehicle.
33

Top speed

217 > 202 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is greater in comparison to this of the Peugeot by 15 kilometers/hour, which allows the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d to overcome quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 15 km/h is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,599 cc
The Land Rover has by 399 cc bigger engine size than the Peugeot. This play a little role when it comes to car's performance, as both values does not vary much.
8

Maximum load capacity

710 > 561 kg
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2011 > 2009
Because of the fact that the Peugeot 3008 was launched only 2 years prior to the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4, the gap between technology applied in both cars shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d may have a bit more new solutions applied in it.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
A manual transmission that is placed in the Peugeot 3008 1.6 THP 156HP manual is less complex construction and is cheaper in use but it is less comfortable as it requires the driver to put on clutch and shift gears and it can be lot of inconvenience in a bussy urban traffic where we have lots of frequent stop and go conditions. An automatic transmission installed in the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 with 6 – speeds gearbox is in our opinion better one.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,348 > 2,025 kg
0

Curb weight

1,636 > 1,456 kg

Peugeot

4 reasons for Peugeot 3008 1.6 THP 156KM manual in comparison to Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

7.1 > 8.5 l
The Peugeot 3008 burns up 17 % fewer fuel in the mixed cycle when compared to the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d. The Peugeot 3008, being palced in „mini 4x4” class uses by 0.4 l less amount of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 7.5 l.
56

Urban consumption

9.9 > 11.7 l
The Peugeot 3008 consumes 1.8 l fewer fuel in city traffic in relation to the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d. The difference at the level of 15 % will be quite big in everyday using vehicle. Additionally, during years it may bring real and noticeable cost savings. Also keep in mind that medium results of the average fuel efficiency might be considerably raised if you drive dynamically. The difference in fuel economy of the cars compared by you is so big that you should consider to choose vehicles with similar engines. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,395 > 1,750 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower number of rotations at which the highest torque is delivered has an impact on an engine’s dynamism and flexibility. Still, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is always worth to check a torque graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.8 > 6.9 l

Cars specifications

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 Peugeot 3008 1.6 THP 156HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,796 kg -
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2011 2009
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK