Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Kirakiraouji Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

20 reasons for

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 Si4 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Renault Captur, model available from 2013.
It has Energy TCe 90HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual
Land Rover

20 reasons for Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

240 > 90 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that majority of us attach the biggest attention to. In this case, it is the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d, that has by 167 percent more horsepower in relation to the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual, which makes this car a lot of faster. Having more horsepower the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 should as well provide distinctly more flexiblility in specific gears.
59

Maximal torque

338 > 135 Nm
When you push the gas pedal and you start accelerating fast, that’s torque you’re feeling. And you will experience it better sitting at the steering wheel of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 because it has 203 newton meters more torque when compared to the Renault. These two vehicles differ so much that only riding the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 you will experience a pleasurable feeling of getting pinned back in the seat when the car accelerate.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.6 > 12.9 s
The Land Rover speeds up to 100k\h by 41 % better than the Renault Captur. A noticable difference in acceleration in favor of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque will allow him to overtake much quicker and avoid other obstacles.
38

Trunk capacity

575 > 377 l
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 198 liters larger boot in comparison to the Renault. Such a difference is quite significant so it will distinctly affect the comfort of the car’s usage. At the same time that the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d has 130 liters bigger boot capacity than the average in its segment. Bigger luggage compartment will be useful during family traveling and also during daily car’s usage.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,447 > 453 l
33

Top speed

217 > 171 km/h
The Renault Captur has by 46 kilometers per hour lower top speed in relation to the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, as a result of which driving a long distance, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, will need more time. The difference may be perceptible during running over on the road without speed limits to the vehicle of Land Rover brand advantage.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,750 > 2,500 revolutions/minute
A greater range as well as a lower number of rotations at which the maximum torque is produced determines an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. However, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is always worth to see a torque performance graph.
15

Wheelbase

2,667 > 2,601 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of better vehicle's weight distribution. Land Rover has 66 millimeters longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Renault Captur. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 has a one additional gear compared to the Renault Captur. Generally the additional gear is a taller one so that the previous speeds can be shorter in order to allow better performance in the lower speeds. One more gear also helps to lower fuel consumption and CO2 output.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 899 cc
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 has 1,099 cubic centimeters bigger engine displacement in comparison to the Renault Captur. Such a huge difference makes that comparision of this features not reallu have a sense. The Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual would be the right choice for those who apreciate lower fuel consumption and car running costs at the expense of car’s performance, however, owners the Land Rover should benefit from better power, flexibility, smoothness of the engine and consequently better fun from driving.
8

Maximum load capacity

710 > 557 kg
6

Length

4,365 > 4,122 mm
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 243 mm longer when compared to the Renault Captur. Long vehicles have more interior space and also have more storage space. Although the Land Rover seems to be better for families or those who value comfortable driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Renault Captur may be more appropriate to city drivers as it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,635 > 1,566 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of carrying massive amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 69 mm in favor of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a comfortable travelling around town, it is worth to have an automatic but the type of transmisison can have a substantial impact on fuel economy. Automatics may burn up somewhere from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Payload

2,348 > 1,662 kg
0

Front track

1,625 > 1,529 mm
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Curb weight

1,636 > 1,100 kg

Renault

5 reasons for Renault Captur Energy TCe 90KM manual in comparison to Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.1 > 8.5 l
The Renault Captur uses 40 percent less fuel in the combined cycle than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d. The difference at the level of 3.4 l will be very appreciable in day-to-day usage of the vehicle. In the long period of time it will bring you a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

6 > 11.7 l
The Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual burns 5.7 l less fuel in city traffic compared with the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d. The difference at the level of 49 percent will be very big in everyday using vehicle. Additionally, during long period of time it will give gigantic cost savings. Moreover bear in mind that presented results of the average fuel efficiency can be considerably increased if you ride swiftly. The difference in fuel economy of the cars selected by you is so huge that you should consider to choose vehicles with similar engines. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.3 > 6.9 l
1

Model release date

2013 > 2011
Given that the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque was introduced only 2 years prior to the Renault, the gap between technology used in both cars is not really huge, however, the Renault might feature slightly more modern solutions used in it.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,250 > 5,500 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,796 kg -
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2011 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK