Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D4 163HP manual 4x4 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D4 163HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

16 reasons for

Volvo XC60 SUV, model available from 2008.
It has 2.4 D4 163HP diesel engine produced from 2012 to 2013.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

8 reasons for

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 Si4 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4
Volvo

16 reasons for Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D4 163KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 8.5 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Volvo XC60 SUV's advantage. This car consumes 34 % less oil in the combined cycle when compared with the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d. Bear in mind that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the small off-road 4x4 segment, in which the Volvo XC60 SUV is classified, equals to 7.5 l while the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D4 163HP manual 4x4 burns up by 25 percent less fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

420 > 338 Nm
The Volvo XC60 has 24 % more torque in comparison to the Land Rover. Even though a great deal of drivers do not appreciate the maximum torque when buying a car, it reflects the best how fast a vehicle is speeding up. In this case the difference is insensible so it probably will not make a real difference in feeling of driving a car.
56

Urban consumption

6.5 > 11.7 l
The Volvo XC60 SUV burns up 5.2 l fewer fuel in city traffic compared with the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. The difference at the level of 5.2 l is quite significant in using vehicle. Additionally, during years it may give real and noticeable cost savings. Also note that presented results of the average fuel efficiency may be considerably lifted if you move swiftly. The difference in fuel consumption of the cars selected by you is so colossal that you should consider to choose vehicles with similar engines. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,500 > 1,750 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower value of rotations at which the maximum torque is reached has an impact on an engine’s dynamism and flexibility. Still, to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is always recommended to check a torque performance graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.1 > 6.9 l
15

Wheelbase

2,775 > 2,667 mm
Volvo XC60 SUV has 4 % longer wheelbase in comparison to the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
14

Cylinders

5 > 4
9

Ground clearance

231 > 217 mm
Ground clearance is a crucial factor in many important parameters of a car. It is the most important in SUV vehicles still all vehicles appreciate the higher suspension. The Volvo has 14 mm larger clearance in relation to the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d. In addition to easier mobility in rough terrain, the Volvo XC60 SUV will also be easier to overcome city obstacles like large curbs, for example.
8

Engine capacity

2,401 > 1,998 cc
The Volvo XC60 has by 403 cubic centimeters bigger engine capacity when compared to the Land Rover. This may have a little impact on vehicle's performance, as both figures does not differ much.
6

Length

4,629 > 4,365 mm
The Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D4 163HP manual 4x4 is 6 % longer in relation to the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d. The length of the vehicle is important when it comes to driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D4 163HP manual 4x4 preasumbly will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Volvo XC60 will be better driven ,however, the Land Rover will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
1

Height

1,714 > 1,635 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Volvo XC60 SUV, which is by 5 percent higher than the Land Rover, would be better option for you. However, compared cars do not vary much in its height and it should not be much observable.
1

Trunk length with seats down

1,786 > 1,581 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 5,500 revolutions/minute
0

Trunk width

1,586 > 1,089 mm
0

Front track

1,635 > 1,625 mm
0

Valves

20 > 16

Land Rover

8 reasons for Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D4 163HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

240 > 163 hp
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d comes with petrol which makes by 47 % more horsepower than the the engine of the Volvo XC60, giving the vehicle a more sporty character. It seems to be googd choice to those who would like to experience thrill of drive a sports car.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.6 > 10.5 s
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d accelerates to 100k\h by 2.9 s better when compared to the Volvo. A noticable difference in acceleration in favor of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque will allow him to overtake much faster and avoid other obstacles.
38

Trunk capacity

575 > 495 l
If you are looking for a car by which you could set of for travels, which could room more things in the boot , take the Land Rover. The Volvo XC60 SUV has by 16 % smaller luggage compartment in relation to the Volvo XC60 SUV so you would be able to load a bit less. Assessing the boot also pay attention to its width length and height which have appreciable impact on loading possibility (Trunk dimensions of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 - 1,089 mm/868 millimeters).
33

Top speed

217 > 195 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Land Rover is higher in comparison to this of the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D4 163HP manual 4x4 which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 22 kilometers/hour is not big and is not realy noticable in everyday use.
1

Model release date

2011 > 2008
The difference in date of commencement of production between presented vehicles is only 3 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a fast pace what may cause that the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d may have more modern solutionswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For drivers who opt for less absorbing driving a vehicle and don’t want to struggle with complications resulting from the stick shift we recommend vehicles equipped with automatic transmission. To those who have a flair for sport driving a manual gearbox may be better because it gives a control of rmp range in which a shift take place.
0

Trunk height

868 > 803 mm
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,125 > 2,120 mm

Cars specifications

Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D4 163HP manual 4x4 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV 5d 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4
    Gross trailer weight - 1,796 kg
    Price range luxury luxury
    Model release date 2008 2011
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK