Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4 vs Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288HP automatic

Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic

12 reasons for

Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV, model available from 2012.
It has 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 8 speed gearbox.

3 reasons for

Toyota Land Cruiser V8, model available from 2008.
It has 4.7 V8 288HP ic petrol engine produced from 2008 to 2010.
Drive has automatic gearbox.

Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288HP automatic
Land Rover

12 reasons for Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288HP automatic

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

340 > 288 hp
The horsepower of the Land Rover is by 52 horsepowers grater in comparison to the Toyota Land Cruiser V8. As the difference is small it should not affect the car performance to a large extent.
112

Average consumption

12.5 > 14.4 l
The Land Rover uses 13 % less fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288HP automatic. The Land Rover Range Rover IV, which is palced in „large off-road 4x4” class burns up by 0.3 l more amount of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle is 12.2 l.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.3 > 9.2 s
A little difference in the amount of 21 % indicates that the Toyota Land Cruiser V8 is the worst vehicle of these two compared. In the „large off-road 4x4 segment, being represented by the Toyota Land Cruiser V8, the medium acceleration to 100km/h is 10.5 s and is by 13 percent lower than this of Toyota car.
22

Width

2,073 > 1,973 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Land Rover Range Rover IV is 100 mm wider than the Toyota. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Range

827 > 646 km
19

Fuel tank

104 > 94 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4 that can carry 11 percent more fuel than the Toyota. The average fuel container capacity in the large 4x4 class, from which the Land Rover Range Rover IV comes from, is 84 liters, whereas in large 4x4 class (represented by the Toyota Land Cruiser V8) it amounts to 84 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,926 > 2,858 mm
Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV has 68 mm longer wheelbase when compared to the Toyota Land Cruiser V8. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
6

Length

4,999 > 4,950 mm
The Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4 is 49 mm longer than the Toyota. Long cars have more interior space and in most cases have more storage space. Although the Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV seems to be better option for families or persons who love the idea of comfortable rides, the Toyota Land Cruiser V8 may be more appropriate to the young as it will not cause troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,681 > 1,635 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2012 > 2008
The difference in debut day between compared cars is only 4 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a staggering pace and for that reason the Land Rover Range Rover IV may have more advanced solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
0

Front track

1,690 > 1,638 mm

Toyota

3 reasons for Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288KM automat in comparison to Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
14

Cylinders

8 > 6
8

Engine capacity

4,664 > 2,994 cc
The engine size of the Toyota Land Cruiser V8 is by 56 percent greater in relation to the Land Rover. As a result the Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV will consume less fuel, however, the engine of the Toyota Land Cruiser V8 will be of better quality, working more smoothly and more durable.
1

Height

1,865 > 1,836 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288HP automatic, which is by 2 % higher than the Land Rover Range Rover IV, would be appropriate choice for you. However, these two cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.

Cars specifications

Land Rover Range Rover IV SUV 3.0 V6 S/C 340HP automatic 4x4 Toyota Land Cruiser V8 4.7 V8 288HP automatic
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2012 2008
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload - 3,299 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK