The horsepower of the Lexus RX III SUV 350 277HP automatic 4x4 is by 11 % bigger in relation to the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4. Because the difference is small this should not affect the car performance extensively.
The Lexus RX III SUV 350 277HP automatic 4x4 burns up 2.5 l less fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Mitsubishi. The Lexus RX III SUV, which is palced in „large SUV” class uses by 1 liter less amount of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle amounts to 12.2 l.
Maximum torque of the Lexus is 5 % bigger than the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4. Because of this, the Lexus RX III SUV will accelerate somewhat better and be better to overtake other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the Lexus RX III will burn up less fuel for every 100 km.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
If a dynamic driving is what you enjoy, the Lexus is better for you because it’s
acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is
faster in comparison to
the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d.
The boot of the Lexus RX III SUV is 718 l more spacious than the Mitsubishi. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Lexus RX III will be much more handy. The larger the trunk, the more luggage you can load.
Distance between two sides of a car directly affects interior space for travelers and also stability on road. The Lexus RX III is widther only by 8 mm in relation to the Mitsubishi Pajero IV and is not really important. The average for the „full-size SUV” segment is around 1,866 millimeters and is by 19 millimeters larger than the same feature of the Lexus.
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Lexus RX III SUV that can hold 6 percent more fuel compared with the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4. The average fuel tank size in the large 4x4 class, which is represented by the Lexus RX III SUV, amounts to 84 l, whereas in full-size SUV class (represented by the Mitsubishi) it equals 84 l.
Lexus RX III SUV 350 277HP automatic 4x4 has 7 % longer wheelbase when compared to the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. However, cars having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
The Lexus RX III SUV is 9 % longer than the Mitsubishi. Long vehicles more of passenger space and usually provide plenty of trunk space. While the Lexus RX III SUV 350 277HP automatic 4x4 seems to be better pick for families or drivers who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d 3.8 MIVEC 250HP automatic 4x4 may appeal to city drivers because it will not make troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
Number of doors
It seems to be quite obvious that the five-door Lexus RX III SUV is more usable and if you regularly carry more than one people then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The strongest point of a five-door vehicle is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the back but it’s as well easier to put luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Mitsubishi generally look much cooler and for young drivers who don’t often have passengers in the back seat the Mitsubishi Pajero IV SUV 3d might be a good one, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
Model release date
The difference in release date between these two vehicles is only 3 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a fast pace and for that reason the Lexus RX III SUV may feature more advanced solutionswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.