Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual vs Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual

Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

17 reasons for

Lincoln Aviator, model available from 2003 to 2006.
It has 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2006.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

9 reasons for

Nissan Murano I, model available from 2002 to 2007.
It has 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2007.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual
Lincoln

17 reasons for Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306KM manual in comparison to Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

306 > 234 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of car fans take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this case it is the Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual that has by 31 % more horsepower than the Nissan Murano I. As a result the Lincoln Aviator will achieve higher top speed. Thanks to more horsepower the Lincoln should also give more flexiblility in specific gears.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,187 > 2,006 l
22

Width

1,882 > 1,880 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Lincoln Aviator is 2 millimeters wider than the Nissan. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

84 > 81 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the aspect of fuel tank size is Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual that is able to take by 4 % more fuel than the Nissan.
15

Wheelbase

2,895 > 2,822 mm
Lincoln Aviator has 3 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to the Nissan Murano I. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
14

Cylinders

8 > 6
8

Engine capacity

4,601 > 3,499 cc
The Lincoln has 31 percent greater engine capacity when compared to the Nissan Murano I. The difference is large. As a result the Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher top speed. On the other hand larger engine displacement affects worst fuel efficiency.
6

Length

4,909 > 4,770 mm
The Lincoln Aviator is 139 millimeters longer than the Nissan Murano I. The length of the car plays a role in respect of driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Lincoln Aviator preasumbly will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual will be better driven ,however, the Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual will be a slightly easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2003 > 2002
Given that the Nissan was unveiled only 1 year earlier than the Lincoln Aviator, the distance in technology used in both cars is not really big, however, the Lincoln might feature slightly more new solutions applied in it.
1

Height

1,812 > 1,692 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Lincoln Aviator, which is by 7 percent higher than the Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual, would be appropriate pick for you. However, presented cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.
1

Tire width

245 > 235 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,750 > 5,800 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

7 > 5
0

Payload

2,742 > 2,205 kg
0

Valves

32 > 24
0

Curb weight

2,239 > 1,588 kg

Nissan

9 reasons for Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234KM manual in comparison to Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

11.8 > 18.1 l
The Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual consumes of 6.3 l gasoline less in the urban cycle in comparison to the Lincoln Aviator. The Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual, as a representative of large 4x4 class, burns up of 3 liters/100Km less than the medium level in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “full-size SUV” class equals to 14.8 l/100Km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.9 > 10 s
A small difference at the level of 21 % indicates that the Lincoln Aviator is insignificantly beaten in this confrontation. In the „large off-road 4x4” segment, to which the Lincoln Aviator is assigned, the medium acceleration is 10.5 s and is by 5 percent slower than acceleration of Lincoln’s car.
38

Trunk capacity

923 > 349 l
The trunk of the Nissan Murano I is 164 percent larger compared to the Lincoln. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Nissan will be much more convenient. The larger the boot, the more baggage you can transport.
12

Urban range

695 > 470 km
8

Maximum load capacity

616 > 500 kg
4

Rear track

1,619 > 1,554 mm
0

Front track

1,620 > 1,547 mm
0

End of model sale

2007 > 2006
0

Tire diameter

18 > 17 ″

Cars specifications

Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2003 2002
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 2,742 kg 2,205 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK