Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4 vs Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual

Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker All Rights Released into the public domain

15 reasons for

Porsche Cayenne I, model available from 2002 to 2006.
It has 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2006.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

12 reasons for

Lincoln Aviator, model available from 2003 to 2006.
It has 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2006.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual
Porsche

15 reasons for Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

17.7 > 18.1 l
The Porsche Cayenne I consumes 2 % fewer fuel in city traffic than the Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual. The Porsche, which represents large off-road 4x4 class, burns up 2.9 l less petrol. Note that average fuel consumption in the urban for the large 4x4 class equals to 14.8 l, while the Porsche Cayenne I uses by 19 percent more amount of fuel than the average.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.1 > 10 s
The Lincoln Aviator is relatively slower compared to the Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4. The difference in the amount of 0.9 s is not really significant and it should not be strongly taken by you into consideration for buying one of compared vehicles.
38

Trunk capacity

540 > 349 l
The Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4 has 191 liters more capable boot than the Lincoln. Such a difference is quite big and it will distinctly matters when it comes to the comfort of the car’s usage. It is worth to note that the Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4 has 28 % bigger trunk capacity than the average in its class. Bigger luggage compartment will be useful during family traveling as well as while everyday car’s usage.
33

Top speed

214 > 180 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4 is greater in comparison to the Lincoln by 19, which allows the Porsche to overcome faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 19 percent is small and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,928 > 1,882 mm
Distance between two sides of a car directly affects interior space for travelers and also stability during driving. The width of the Porsche is larger only by 46 mm than the Lincoln Aviator and is not really important. The medium for the „full-size SUV” class equals to around 1,866 mm and is by 3 % larger than the same feature of the Porsche Cayenne I.
19

Fuel tank

101 > 84 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4 that can contain 17 l more fuel in relation to the Lincoln. The medium fuel tank capacity in the large off-road 4x4 class, which is represented by the Porsche Cayenne I, equals 84 l, whereas in large off-road 4x4 segment (represented by the Lincoln Aviator) it amounts to 84 liters.
12

Urban range

562 > 470 km
8

Maximum load capacity

785 > 500 kg
4

Rear track

1,665 > 1,554 mm
3

Price range

sports > luxury
1

Tire width

255 > 245 mm
0

Payload

2,941 > 2,742 kg
0

Front track

1,647 > 1,547 mm
0

Tire diameter

18 > 17 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 65 %

Lincoln

12 reasons for Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306KM manual in comparison to Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

306 > 250 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of us pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Lincoln Aviator which has by 22 percent horsepower more in relation to the Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4, which makes this vehicle a bit faster. Having more horsepower the Lincoln Aviator will also give slightly more efficiency in specific gears.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,187 > 1,769 l
15

Wheelbase

2,895 > 2,848 mm
The Lincoln Aviator has 2 percent longer wheelbase when compared to Porsche. Therefore the Lincoln Aviator is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable traveling.
14

Cylinders

8 > 6
8

Engine capacity

4,601 > 3,188 cc
The engine displacement of the Lincoln is by 1,413 cubic centimeters bigger in comparison to the Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4. As a result the Porsche will be more fuel efficient, however, the engine of the Lincoln will be of better quality, working more smoothly and more durable.
6

Length

4,909 > 4,782 mm
The Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual is 3 percent longer than the Porsche Cayenne I. Long vehicles have more interior space and also have plenty of trunk space. Although the Lincoln Aviator occurs to be better for families or persons who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance driving, the Porsche Cayenne I may be more appropriate to the young as it will not cause problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
1

Model release date

2003 > 2002
Because of the fact that the Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4 was introduced only 1 year prior to the Lincoln Aviator, the distance in technology applied in both cars shouldn’t be really big, however, the Lincoln Aviator might have a bit more new solutions applied in it.
1

Height

1,812 > 1,699 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Lincoln, which is by 113 millimeters higher than the Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4, would be better pick for you. However, presented cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,750 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

7 > 5
0

Valves

32 > 24
0

Curb weight

2,239 > 2,162 kg

Cars specifications

Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4 Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual
    Price range sports luxury
    Model release date 2002 2003
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 2,941 kg 2,742 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK