Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual vs Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4

Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

27 reasons for

Lincoln Navigator II, model available from 2002 to 2006.
It has 5.4 i V8 304HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2006.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

2 reasons for

Mazda Tribute I, model available from 2000 to 2007.
It has 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4
Lincoln

27 reasons for Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304KM manual in comparison to Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

304 > 124 hp
The Lincoln has 180 hp more horsepower in comparison to Mazda Tribute I. The Lincoln will be distinctly faster accelerate owing to grater amout of horses under its hoot. Also maneuvers like overtaking and passing obstacles like TIRs or buses while moving along the road should be a piece of cake for the Lincoln Navigator II equipped with stronger motor.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.3 > 13.7 s
If a swift driving is what you realy like, the Lincoln Navigator II is better for you because it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 4.4 s better in relation to the Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4.
38

Trunk capacity

507 > 368 l
The Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual has 139 liters larger trunk in comparison to the Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4. Such a difference is significant so it will matters in terms of the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. At the same time that the Lincoln Navigator II has 33 % bigger boot capacity than the average in the same class. Roomy trunk will be useful during family traveling and also during everyday car’s usage.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,965 > 2,247 l
33

Top speed

170 > 166 km/h
The top velocity of the Lincoln Navigator II is higher as compared to this of the Mazda Tribute I which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 4 kilometers/hour is little and is not realy noticable in daily driving.
22

Width

2,037 > 1,795 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly influences on the amount of space for passengers as well as stability during driving. The Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual is widther by 13 % in comparison to the Mazda and is not really relevant. The medium for the „large SUV” class equals to approximately 1,866 mm and is by 171 millimeters larger than the same attribute of the Lincoln Navigator II.
19

Fuel tank

105 > 57 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Lincoln Navigator II that can carry 84 percent more fuel in comparison to the Mazda. The average fuel container size in the full-size SUV class, from which the Lincoln comes from, equals 84 liters, whereas in full-size SUV class (represented by the Mazda Tribute I) it is 84 liters.
15

Wheelbase

3,025 > 2,622 mm
Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual has 15 % longer wheelbase than the Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. However, cars with a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
14

Cylinders

8 > 4
12

Urban range

541 > 442 km
9

Ground clearance

216 > 200 mm
Ground clearance means the gap between the car body and the ground. taking these two cars into consideration, it is the Lincoln Navigator II which has 8 % higher ground clearance than the Mazda Tribute I. For this reason the Lincoln Navigator II will deal better when driving over imperfect roads and obstacles in the city. One drawback is the higher ride height means a higher center of gravity, which can negatively affect the handling of the Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual.
8

Engine capacity

5,398 > 1,989 cc
The Lincoln has 3,409 cc bigger engine displacement in relation to the Mazda. Such a considerable difference makes that comparision of this characteristics have little sense. The Mazda seems to be the right choice for drivers who apreciate lower fuel consumption and operating costs at the expense of slower driving, however, owners the Lincoln Navigator II would benefit from grater power, flexibility, smoothness of the car and as a result better joy when driving.
8

Maximum load capacity

605 > 490 kg
6

Length

5,228 > 4,395 mm
The Lincoln Navigator II is 19 percent longer in comparison to the Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4. The length of the vehicle is important in respect of travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Lincoln very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Lincoln Navigator II will be better driven ,however, the Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4 will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,704 > 1,550 mm
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A Vee engine is a developed version of a In-line engine which according to us is wiser to choose one. Engine of V layout in a vehicle the Lincoln gives more torque at lower RPM ranges because of the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor can contain more cylinders in a smaller package. A Better engine work and nicer sound is to driving fans certainly to a V engine’s advantage.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2002 > 2000
Given that the Mazda Tribute I was launched only 2 years prior to the Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual, the distance in technology applied in both cars shouldn’t be really big, however, the Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual may feature slightly more new solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,975 > 1,710 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Lincoln Navigator II, which is by 15 % higher than the Mazda Tribute I, is better choice for you. However, presented vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
1

Tire width

255 > 215 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 5,300 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

8 > 5
0

Payload

3,305 > 1,986 kg
0

Front track

1,701 > 1,553 mm
0

Valves

32 > 16
0

Tire diameter

18 > 16 ″
0

Curb weight

2,701 > 1,490 kg

Mazda

2 reasons for Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

12.7 > 19.6 l
The Mazda Tribute I consumes 35 percent fewer fuel in the city than the Lincoln. The difference at the level of 6.9 l will be quite big in using car. Additionally, during several years it may bring real and noticeable cost savings. Also keep in mind that presented results of the average fuel efficiency might be considerably increased if you drive swiftly. The difference in fuel economy of the cars selected by you is so tremendous that you should consider to choose cars with similar engines. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
0

End of model sale

2007 > 2006

Cars specifications

Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2002 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 3,305 kg 1,986 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK