Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual vs Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual

Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

18 reasons for

Lincoln Navigator II, model available from 2002 to 2006.
It has 5.4 i V8 304HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2006.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

7 reasons for

Nissan Murano I, model available from 2002 to 2007.
It has 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2007.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual
Lincoln

18 reasons for Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304KM manual in comparison to Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

304 > 234 hp
The Lincoln Navigator II has 70 hp more horsepower compared to Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual. The Lincoln Navigator II will be distinctly quicker accelerate thanks to grater amout of horses under its hoot. Also passing other cars while moving along the road should be much more easier for a vehicle equipped with more powerful engine.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,965 > 2,006 l
22

Width

2,037 > 1,880 mm
distance between left and right side of a car affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability on road. The Lincoln Navigator II is widther by 157 millimeters compared with the Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual and is not really important. The average for the „full-size SUV” class equals to approximately 1,866 millimeters and is by 9 % larger than the same attribute of the Lincoln Navigator II.
19

Fuel tank

105 > 81 l
The Nissan loses with the Lincoln Navigator II in the field of fuel tank capacity. The Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual is able to store by 24 l more fuel than its competitor.
15

Wheelbase

3,025 > 2,822 mm
The Lincoln Navigator II has 203 mm longer wheelbase when compared to Nissan Murano I. Consequently the Lincoln Navigator II is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable riding.
14

Cylinders

8 > 6
8

Engine capacity

5,398 > 3,499 cc
The Lincoln Navigator II has 1,899 cubic centimeters greater engine capacity in relation to the Nissan Murano I. The difference is relatively substantia. Consequently the Lincoln Navigator II should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine size means worst fuel efficiency.
6

Length

5,228 > 4,770 mm
The Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual is 458 mm longer in relation to the Nissan Murano I. Long vehicles have more interior space and in most cases provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual seems to be better choice for families or persons who value comfortable driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Nissan Murano I may be more appropriate to city drivers as it will not cause problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,704 > 1,619 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,975 > 1,692 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of big size, the Lincoln, which is by 283 mm higher than the Nissan Murano I, would be better option for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.
1

Tire width

255 > 235 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 5,800 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

8 > 5
0

Payload

3,305 > 2,205 kg
0

Front track

1,701 > 1,620 mm
0

Valves

32 > 24
0

Curb weight

2,701 > 1,588 kg

Nissan

7 reasons for Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234KM manual in comparison to Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

11.8 > 19.6 l
The Nissan Murano I consumes 40 percent of gasoline less in the city in comparison to the Lincoln. The Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual, which comes from full-size SUV segment, consumes 3 l fewer petrol, which constitutes by 21 % lower result than the average in the same class. The difference in fuel consumption between these two cars is quite significant, so remember that in order to the the comparison have a sense, you should choose vehicles with similar characteristics.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.9 > 9.3 s
The Lincoln Navigator II is relatively slower compared to the Nissan Murano I. The difference in the amount of 15 % is not really significant and it should not be substantially taken by you into as important for selecting the better one of these two vehicles.
38

Trunk capacity

923 > 507 l
The boot of the Nissan is 82 % more spacious compared to the Lincoln Navigator II. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Nissan Murano I will be much more convenient. The larger the boot, the more baggage you can hold.
12

Urban range

695 > 541 km
8

Maximum load capacity

616 > 605 kg
0

End of model sale

2007 > 2006
0

Tire profile

65 > 70 %

Cars specifications

Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2002 2002
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 3,305 kg 2,205 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK