Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual vs Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4

Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

16 reasons for

Lincoln Navigator II, model available from 2002 to 2006.
It has 5.4 i V8 304HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2006.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

8 reasons for

Porsche Cayenne I, model available from 2002 to 2006.
It has 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2006.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4
Lincoln

16 reasons for Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304KM manual in comparison to Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

304 > 250 hp
The horsepower is a characteristic that most of car fans pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Lincoln Navigator II that has by 54 horsepower more when compared to the Porsche Cayenne I, which makes this car somewhat quicker. With more horsepower the Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual should as well provide somewhat more flexiblility in specific gears.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,965 > 1,769 l
22

Width

2,037 > 1,928 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Lincoln is 109 millimeters wider in comparison to the Porsche Cayenne I. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

105 > 101 l
In this category it is the Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual which can hold 4 percent more fuel in relation to the Porsche. The average fuel tank size in the large off-road 4x4 class, which is represented by the Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual, amounts to 84 liters, whereas in full-size SUV segment (represented by the Porsche) it is 84 liters.
15

Wheelbase

3,025 > 2,848 mm
Lincoln has 177 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to the Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
14

Cylinders

8 > 6
8

Engine capacity

5,398 > 3,188 cc
The engine displacement of the Lincoln Navigator II is by 69 % larger when compared to the Porsche. For this reason the Porsche will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Lincoln will be of better performance, working more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
6

Length

5,228 > 4,782 mm
The Lincoln Navigator II is 9 percent longer in relation to the Porsche Cayenne I. Long cars have more interior space and also provide more storage space. While the Lincoln Navigator II seems to be better pick for families or drivers who appreciate convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Porsche may be more appropriate to singles as it will not cause troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,704 > 1,665 mm
1

Height

1,975 > 1,699 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater possibility of loading big amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 16 % to the advantage of the Lincoln is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

8 > 5
0

Payload

3,305 > 2,941 kg
0

Front track

1,701 > 1,647 mm
0

Valves

32 > 24
0

Curb weight

2,701 > 2,162 kg

Porsche

8 reasons for Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

17.7 > 19.6 l
The Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4 burns up of 10 % fuel fewer in the city in relation to the Lincoln Navigator II. The Porsche Cayenne I, which is classified in full-size SUV segment, consumes of 2.9 l of fuel for every 100 km more than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “full-size SUV” class equals to 14.8 l of fuel for every 100 km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.1 > 9.3 s
A small difference at the level of 2 % suggests that the Lincoln is the worst car of these two compared. In the „full-size SUV class, being represented by the Lincoln Navigator II, the medium acceleration amounts to 10.5 s and is by 12 % lower than this of Lincoln car.
38

Trunk capacity

540 > 507 l
If you are looking for a vehicles by which you could set of for journeys, which could contain more things in the boot , choose the Porsche Cayenne I. The Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual has by 7 percent smaller boot in comparison to the Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual so in this case you would be able to load a bit less. Assessing the luggage compartment check its dimensions which have appreciable impact on loading possibility .
33

Top speed

214 > 170 km/h
The Porsche Cayenne I has by 44 kilometers/hour higher maximum speed in relation to the Lincoln Navigator II, thanks to which a long route, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, can be covered much more faster. The difference might be perceptible during travelling over fast and long routes.
12

Urban range

562 > 541 km
8

Maximum load capacity

785 > 605 kg
3

Price range

sports > luxury
0

Tire profile

55 > 70 %

Cars specifications

Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4
    Price range luxury sports
    Model release date 2002 2002
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 3,305 kg 2,941 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK