Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution III 2.0 Turbo 270HP vs MG F I 1.6 111HP

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution III 2.0 Turbo 270HP

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

9 reasons for

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution III, model available from 1995 to 1996.
It has 2.0 Turbo 270HP petrol engine produced from 1995 to 1996.
Drive has manual gearbox.

1 reason for

MG F I, model available from 1995 to 2000.
It has 1.6 111HP petrol engine produced from 1995 to 2000.
Drive has manual gearbox.

MG F I 1.6 111HP
Mitsubishi

9 reasons for Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution III 2.0 Turbo 270KM in comparison to MG F I 1.6 111HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

270 > 111 hp
The MG F I significantly gives way to the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution III in the field of amount of horses under the hood having them by 159 hp less. Consequently the engine installed in the Mitsubishi has lots of power and rapid acceleration.
22

Width

1,695 > 1,624 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution III is 71 millimeters wider when compared to the MG F I 1.6 111HP. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,519 > 2,389 mm
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution III has 5 percent longer wheelbase than the MG F I. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
6

Length

4,310 > 3,910 mm
The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution III is 10 percent longer in relation to the MG F I 1.6 111HP. Long cars have more interior space and also have bigger trunk. Although the Mitsubishi seems to be better choice for families or those who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance rides, the MG may be more appropriate to singles because it will not cause problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,469 > 1,400 mm
3

Number of doors

4 > 2
For those who appreciate a comfortable vehicle the 4-door Mitsubishi is much better to opt for. Nevertheless, for people that are looking for better look of the car we recommend to choose the two-door MG F I.
1

Height

1,420 > 1,270 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Mitsubishi, which is by 12 % higher than the MG F I, would be appropriate choice for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Number of seats

5 > 2
0

Front track

1,466 > 1,409 mm

MG

1 reason for MG F I 1.6 111KM in comparison to Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution III 2.0 Turbo 270HP

Reasons for
0

End of model sale

2000 > 1996

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution III 2.0 Turbo 270HP MG F I 1.6 111HP
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1995 1995
    Facelifting no no
    Class S S
    End of model sale 1996 2000
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK