Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV 2.0 Turbo 280HP vs MG F I 1.6 111HP

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV 2.0 Turbo 280HP

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

10 reasons for

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV, model available from 1996 to 1998.
It has 2.0 Turbo 280HP petrol engine produced from 1996 to 1998.
Drive has manual gearbox.

2 reasons for

MG F I, model available from 1995 to 2000.
It has 1.6 111HP petrol engine produced from 1995 to 2000.
Drive has manual gearbox.

MG F I 1.6 111HP
Mitsubishi

10 reasons for Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV 2.0 Turbo 280KM in comparison to MG F I 1.6 111HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

280 > 111 hp
The MG F I noticeably loses with the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV in the category of horsepower having them by 169 hp less. As a result the engine installed in the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV provides relatively lots of power and rapid acceleration.
22

Width

1,691 > 1,624 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV 2.0 Turbo 280HP is 67 millimeters wider when compared to the MG. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,513 > 2,389 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more appropriate car's weight distribution. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV has 124 millimeters longer wheelbase distance in relation to MG F I. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Mitsubishi should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
6

Length

4,330 > 3,910 mm
The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV is 420 mm longer when compared to the MG. The length of the car is important when it comes to driving comfort and room in the boot. The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV 2.0 Turbo 280HP probably will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV 2.0 Turbo 280HP will be better driven but the MG will be a slightly easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,469 > 1,400 mm
3

Number of doors

4 > 2
For people that need a vehicle for more than two persons the 4-door Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV is much better to use. Nevertheless, for people that value sporty design of the vehicle we suggest choosing the two-door MG F I 1.6 111HP.
1

Model release date

1996 > 1995
The difference in debut day between presented vehicles is only 1 year, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a blistering pace and for that reason the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV may have more advanced solutions.
1

Height

1,415 > 1,270 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Mitsubishi, which is by 145 mm higher than the MG, is appropriate pick for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Number of seats

5 > 2
0

Front track

1,473 > 1,409 mm

MG

2 reasons for MG F I 1.6 111KM in comparison to Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV 2.0 Turbo 280HP

Reasons for
19

Fuel tank

50 > 49 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the MG F I that can hold 2 % more fuel in comparison to the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV 2.0 Turbo 280HP. The medium fuel container capacity in the S class, which is represented by the MG F I, amounts to 68 l, whereas in S segment (represented by the Mitsubishi) it equals 68 l.
0

End of model sale

2000 > 1998

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV 2.0 Turbo 280HP MG F I 1.6 111HP
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1996 1995
    Facelifting no no
    Class S S
    End of model sale 1998 2000
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK