Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual vs MG TF I Cabrio 1.8 116HP

Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

11 reasons for

Toyota Celica VII, model available from 1999 to 2006.
It has 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP petrol engine produced from 2001 to 2006.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

1 reason for

MG TF I Cabrio, model available from 2002 to 2005.
It has 1.8 116HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2005.
Drive has manual gearbox.

MG TF I Cabrio 1.8 116HP
Toyota

11 reasons for Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192KM manual in comparison to MG TF I Cabrio 1.8 116HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

192 > 116 hp
The horsepower is a characteristic that most of us take into account at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Toyota that has by 76 more horsepower in relation to the MG TF I Cabrio. Therefore the Toyota is able to reach higher top speed. Having more horsepower the Toyota will also provide more flexiblility in specific speeds.
38

Trunk capacity

367 > 211 l
The Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual features 156 liters larger boot in relation to the MG TF I. Such a difference is quite big and it will distinctly is relevant to the comfort of the car’s usage. It is worth to note that the Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual has 36 % bigger trunk size than the average in its class. More spacious trunk will be useful during family traveling as well as while daily driving.
22

Width

1,731 > 1,630 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Toyota Celica VII is 101 mm wider in comparison to the MG. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

56 > 50 l
The MG TF I gives way to the Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual in the field of fuel tank capacity. The Toyota is able to hold by 12 % more fuel compared with its competitor.
15

Wheelbase

2,600 > 2,380 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Toyota Celica VII has 9 % longer wheelbase distance in relation to MG TF I Cabrio. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
6

Length

4,330 > 3,936 mm
The Toyota is 10 % longer in comparison to the MG TF I Cabrio. Long vehicles are more spacious and also provide bigger trunk. Although the Toyota Celica VII seems to be better for families or those who love the idea of comfortable driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the MG TF I Cabrio 1.8 116HP may appeal to women as it will not make troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,480 > 1,412 mm
1

Height

1,305 > 1,260 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of carrying massive amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars of 4 percent in favor of the Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual is not big and does not matter much.
0

Number of seats

4 > 2
0

Front track

1,490 > 1,400 mm
0

End of model sale

2006 > 2005

MG

1 reason for MG TF I Cabrio 1.8 116KM in comparison to Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual

Reasons for
1

Model release date

2002 > 1999
The difference in date of commencement of production between compared vehicles is only 3 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a blistering pace and for that reason the MG TF I may have more modern solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.

Cars specifications

Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual MG TF I Cabrio 1.8 116HP
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1999 2002
    Facelifting no no
    Class S S
    Payload 1,560 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK