The horsepower of the MG ZS Hatchback 1.4 103HP is by 4 % bigger when compared to the Toyota Auris II Hatchback 5d. While the difference is small it should not affect the car performance considerably.
With more trunk space the MG ZS Hatchback 1.4 103HP will have much more room for carrying things and be more usefull vehicle than the Toyota Auris II Hatchback 5d. If the size of the luggage compartment is important to you, the MG ZS will be better to buy because it is around 30 percent larger than the boot of its rival.
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the MG ZS that can contain 8 percent more fuel than the Toyota Auris II Hatchback 5d Dual VVT-i 100 99HP manual. The average fuel container capacity in the lower middle class, which is represented by the MG ZS Hatchback 1.4 103HP, equals 52 l, whereas in lower middle segment (represented by the Toyota Auris II Hatchback 5d Dual VVT-i 100 99HP manual) it equals 52 l.
The wheelbase of a car is the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. MG ZS Hatchback has 22 millimeters longer wheelbase distance when compared to Toyota Auris II Hatchback 5d Dual VVT-i 100 99HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of MG ZS Hatchback should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
The MG ZS is 254 mm longer in comparison to the Toyota. Long cars have more interior space and also have more storage space. Although the MG ZS Hatchback seems to be better option for families or drivers who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Toyota Auris II may be more appropriate to singles as it will not make troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.