Mitsubishi Colt V 1.3 i 16V 82HP manual vs Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual

Mitsubishi Colt V 1.3 i 16V 82HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

10 reasons for

Mitsubishi Colt V, model available from 1996 to 2003.
It has 1.3 i 16V 82HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2003.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Mazda 121 III, model available from 1996 to 2003.
It has 1.2 75HP petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2003.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual
Mitsubishi

10 reasons for Mitsubishi Colt V 1.3 i 16V 82KM manual in comparison to Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

82 > 75 hp
The horsepower of the Mitsubishi Colt V is by 9 percent grater in comparison to the Mazda 121 III. Because the difference is small this should not affect the vehicles performance largely.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12.5 > 12.7 s
A small difference at the level of 2 % shows that the Mazda is slightly beaten here. In the „B” segment, to which the Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual is assigned, the average acceleration amounts to 12.9 s and is by 0.2 s slower than acceleration of Mazda’s vehicle.
22

Width

1,678 > 1,637 mm
Width of a vehicle affects room in the cabin and also stability while driving. The Mitsubishi Colt V 1.3 i 16V 82HP manual is widther only by 3 % than the Mazda 121 III and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „supermini” class equals to around 1,645 mm and is by 33 mm smaller than the width of the Mitsubishi.
19

Fuel tank

49 > 42 l
The winner of selected cars in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Mitsubishi which is able to take by 17 % more fuel compared with the Mazda 121 III.
8

Engine capacity

1,298 > 1,242 cc
The Mitsubishi Colt V has 5 percent larger engine displacement in comparison to the Mazda. For the reason that the difference is not big, the Mitsubishi should accelerate only a bit faster, assuming that other paramerters are the same.
6

Length

3,885 > 3,828 mm
The Mitsubishi Colt V is 57 mm longer in relation to the Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual. Long cars have roomy cabin and usually have more storage space. Although the Mitsubishi Colt V 1.3 i 16V 82HP manual occurs to be better pick for families or drivers who appreciate convenient driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mazda 121 III may appeal to the young as it will not cause troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
1

Height

1,365 > 1,330 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Mitsubishi, which is by 35 mm higher than the Mazda, is appropriate option for you. However, these two cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,447 > 1,436 kg
0

Curb weight

943 > 915 kg

Mazda

9 reasons for Mazda 121 III 1.2 75KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Colt V 1.3 i 16V 82HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

7.3 > 9.2 l
The Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual consumes of 21 % gasoline fewer in city traffic in relation to the Mitsubishi Colt V. The Mazda, as a representative of subcompact class, consumes 0.2 l/100Km less than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “small cars” class equals to 7.5 l/100Km.
38

Trunk capacity

252 > 240 l
The trunk of the Mazda 121 III is only 5 % bigger than the Mitsubishi Colt V. However, the difference is not big it would be fair to say that both vehicles have similar trunk space.
15

Wheelbase

2,456 > 2,420 mm
The Mazda 121 III has 1 percent longer wheelbase than Mitsubishi. As a result the Mazda 121 III is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable riding.
12

Urban range

560 > 543 km
8

Maximum load capacity

520 > 500 kg
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
It is beyond the question that the five-door Mazda 121 III is more convenient and if you frequently carry more than one passenger then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The strongest point of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the back but it’s also easier to put luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Mitsubishi Colt V very often look much cooler and for young drivers who don’t often have passengers in the back seat the Mitsubishi Colt V may be a good one, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
1

Tire width

185 > 175 mm
0

Tire diameter

14 > 13 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 70 %

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Colt V 1.3 i 16V 82HP manual Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1996 1996
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
    Payload 1,447 kg 1,436 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK