The horsepower of the Mitsubishi Colt V is by 9 percent grater in comparison to the Mazda 121 III. Because the difference is small this should not affect the vehicles performance largely.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
A small difference at the level of 2 % shows that the Mazda is slightly beaten here. In the „B” segment, to which the Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual is assigned, the average acceleration amounts to 12.9 s and is by 0.2 s slower than acceleration of Mazda’s vehicle.
Width of a vehicle affects room in the cabin and also stability while driving. The Mitsubishi Colt V 1.3 i 16V 82HP manual is widther only by 3 % than the Mazda 121 III and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „supermini” class equals to around 1,645 mm and is by 33 mm smaller than the width of the Mitsubishi.
The winner of selected cars in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Mitsubishi which is able to take by 17 % more fuel compared with the Mazda 121 III.
The Mitsubishi Colt V has 5 percent larger engine displacement in comparison to the Mazda. For the reason that the difference is not big, the Mitsubishi should accelerate only a bit faster, assuming that other paramerters are the same.
The Mitsubishi Colt V is 57 mm longer in relation to the Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual. Long cars have roomy cabin and usually have more storage space. Although the Mitsubishi Colt V 1.3 i 16V 82HP manual occurs to be better pick for families or drivers who appreciate convenient driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mazda 121 III may appeal to the young as it will not cause troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Mitsubishi, which is by 35 mm higher than the Mazda, is appropriate option for you. However, these two cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.