Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual vs Peugeot 106 II 1.0 i 50HP manual

Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

15 reasons for

Mazda 121 III, model available from 1996 to 2003.
It has 1.2 75HP petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2003.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Peugeot 106 II, model available from 1996 to 2003.
It has 1.0 i 50HP petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2000.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Peugeot 106 II 1.0 i 50HP manual
Mazda

15 reasons for Mazda 121 III 1.2 75KM manual in comparison to Peugeot 106 II 1.0 i 50HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

75 > 50 hp
The Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual has by 50 percent more horsepower in relation to Peugeot 106 II. The Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual will be distinctly more dynamically speed up because of bigger power. Also leaving behind obstacles like TIRs or buses while moving along the road should be much more easier for the Mazda 121 III equipped with stronger engine.
56

Urban consumption

7.3 > 8.3 l
The Mazda 121 III uses 12 % fewer fuel in city traffic in relation to the Peugeot. The Mazda, that represents supermini class, burns up 0.2 l fewer fuel. It is also worth to know that average fuel consumption in the urban for the B class equals to 7.5 l, whereas the Mazda 121 III uses by 3 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12.7 > 19.2 s
If a swift driving is what you enjoy, the Mazda 121 III will appeal to you as it’s acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is 34 % better than the Peugeot 106 II.
38

Trunk capacity

252 > 215 l
The trunk of the Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual is only 17 percent bigger than the Peugeot. However, the difference is not big it would be right to say that both cars have similar trunk space.
33

Top speed

170 > 150 km/h
The top speed of the ​​Mazda 121 III is greater than this of the Peugeot 106 II 1.0 i 50HP manual by 20 kilometers per hour, which allows the Mazda 121 III to cover faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 13 percent is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,637 > 1,573 mm
Width of a car affects room in the cabin as well as stability while driving. The Mazda 121 III is widther only by 64 millimeters in comparison to the Peugeot 106 II and is not really relevant. The average for the „small cars” segment amounts to around 1,645 mm and is by 8 millimeters smaller than the same feature of the Mazda.
12

Urban range

560 > 542 km
8

Engine capacity

1,242 > 955 cc
The Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual has 30 % bigger cubic capacity in comparison to the Peugeot 106 II 1.0 i 50HP manual. The difference is relatively substantia. For this reason the Mazda should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand greater engine size usually equals worst fuel consumption.
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no question that the five-door Mazda 121 III is more usable and if you regularly drive with more than one people then this car is only possible option for you. The biggest advantage of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the rear seats but it’s as well easier to put luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Peugeot generally look much cooler and for those who don’t often have more than one passengers in the car the Peugeot 106 II might be a good one, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
1

Tire width

185 > 145 mm
0

Payload

1,436 > 1,220 kg
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 8
0

Tire diameter

14 > 13 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 70 %

Peugeot

4 reasons for Peugeot 106 II 1.0 i 50KM manual in comparison to Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual

Reasons for
19

Fuel tank

46 > 42 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Peugeot 106 II which can carry 10 percent more fuel compared with the Mazda 121 III. The average fuel container capacity in the B class, from which the Peugeot 106 II 1.0 i 50HP manual comes from, is 44 l, whereas in small cars class (represented by the Mazda 121 III) it is 44 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,585 > 2,456 mm
The Peugeot 106 II has 129 millimeters longer wheelbase in relation to Mazda 121 III. Thanks to this the Peugeot 106 II is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
6

Length

3,875 > 3,828 mm
The Peugeot 106 II is 1 % longer in relation to the Mazda 121 III. The length of the vehicle is important when it comes to driving comfort and room in the boot. The Peugeot 106 II 1.0 i 50HP manual probably will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Peugeot will be better driven ,however, the Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual will be a little easier to park due to shorter length .
1

Height

1,378 > 1,330 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of loading massive amount of luggage to it. The difference of 48 mm in favor of the Peugeot is small and should not be really noticeable.

Cars specifications

Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual Peugeot 106 II 1.0 i 50HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1996 1996
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
    Payload 1,436 kg 1,220 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK