The Skoda Felicia II Hatchback consumes 0.1 l less fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Mazda 121 III. The Skoda, being palced in „B” segment burns up by 0.3 l more of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 6 liters.
If you need a car by which you could set of for journeys, which could hold more luggage , decide to buy the Skoda Felicia II Hatchback. The Mazda 121 III is equiped with by 8 % less capable luggage compartment compared with the Mazda so you would be able to load one little suitcase less. Assessing the trunk also check its width length and height which have considerable effect on loading possibility .
Width of a vehicle directly influences on interior space for travelers and also stability while driving. The Skoda Felicia II Hatchback 1.3 55HP manual is widther only by 5 millimeters in comparison to the Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual and is not really relevant. The average for the „subcompact” segment amounts to approximately 1,645 mm and is by 3 mm smaller than the width of the Skoda Felicia II Hatchback 1.3 55HP manual.
The Skoda has 3 millimeters longer wheelbase in comparison to Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual. Thanks to this the Skoda Felicia II is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable traveling.
The Skoda Felicia II Hatchback has by 48 cubic centimeters bigger engine size in comparison to the Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual. This play a little role in terms of acceleration, as both values does not differ much.
The Skoda Felicia II is 32 millimeters longer than the Mazda 121 III. The length of the car plays a role when it comes to driving comfort and space in the boot. The Skoda Felicia II very likely will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Skoda Felicia II Hatchback 1.3 55HP manual will be better driven ,however, the Mazda 121 III 1.2 75HP manual will be a slightly easier to park due to shorter length .
Model release date
Because of the fact that the Mazda was launched only 2 years earlier than the Skoda Felicia II Hatchback, the gap between technology used in both vehicles is not really huge, however, the Skoda may have slightly more modern solutions used in it.
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater capacity of putting massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars of 90 mm to the advantage of the Skoda Felicia II Hatchback 1.3 55HP manual is not big and should not be really noticeable.