Mazda 3 I Hatchback 1.4 i 16V 84HP manual vs Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 16V 90HP manual

Mazda 3 I Hatchback 1.4 i 16V 84HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Thomas doerfer Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

16 reasons for

Mazda 3 I Hatchback, model available from 2003 to 2009.
It has 1.4 i 16V 84HP petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2009.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Opel Astra G Hatchback, model available from 1998 to 2009.
It has 1.4 16V 90HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2003.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 16V 90HP manual
Mazda

16 reasons for Mazda 3 I Hatchback 1.4 i 16V 84KM manual in comparison to Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 16V 90HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

8.7 > 9.3 l
The Mazda 3 I Hatchback 1.4 i 16V 84HP manual burns up 7 percent less fuel in urban cycle compared with the Opel Astra G. The difference at the level of 0.6 l will be very significant in daily use of vehicle. Additionally, within several years it will give huge savings. Moreover you shoule take int consideration that presented results of the average fuel consumption can be considerably raised if you move dynamically. The difference in fuel economy of the cars compared by you is so tremendous that you should consider to choose cars with similar engines. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
22

Width

1,755 > 1,705 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Mazda 3 I is 3 % wider in comparison to the Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 16V 90HP manual. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

775 > 754 km
19

Fuel tank

55 > 52 l
The winner of this comparison in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Mazda which can take by 6 percent more fuel compared with the Opel.
15

Wheelbase

2,641 > 2,604 mm
Mazda 3 I Hatchback has 37 mm longer wheelbase when compared to the Opel Astra G Hatchback. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. But, cars having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
12

Urban range

618 > 553 km
8

Maximum load capacity

475 > 457 kg
6

Length

4,413 > 4,108 mm
The Mazda 3 I Hatchback 1.4 i 16V 84HP manual is 7 % longer than the Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 16V 90HP manual. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and usually have plenty of trunk space. Although the Mazda 3 I occurs to be better pick for families or those who value soft, smooth long-distance rides, the Opel Astra G Hatchback may appeal to singles because it will not cause problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,513 > 1,470 mm
1

Model release date

2003 > 1998
The difference in debut day between these two cars is only 5 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a staggering pace and for that reason the Mazda 3 I may feature more advanced solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
1

Height

1,465 > 1,425 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Mazda, which is by 40 mm higher than the Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 16V 90HP manual, would be appropriate pick for you. However, compared cars do not vary much in its height and it should not be much perceptible.
1

Tire width

195 > 175 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,700 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,530 > 1,485 mm
0

Tire diameter

15 > 14 ″
0

Tire profile

65 > 70 %

Opel

8 reasons for Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 16V 90KM manual in comparison to Mazda 3 I Hatchback 1.4 i 16V 84HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

90 > 84 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that majority of us pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Opel that has by 7 % horsepower more in relation to the Mazda 3 I Hatchback, which makes this car a bit quicker. Because of more horsepower the Opel will as well provide somewhat more flexiblility in specific gears.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12.5 > 14.3 s
A little difference in the amount of 13 percent suggests that the Mazda is slightly beaten in this confrontation. In the „C” segment, to which the Mazda 3 I is assigned, the average acceleration is 11.3 s and is by 3 sek faster than acceleration of Mazda’s car.
38

Trunk capacity

370 > 300 l
The Opel Astra G has 70 l bigger boot in comparison to the Mazda 3 I Hatchback. Such a difference is quite big and it will distinctly matters when it comes to the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. It is worth to note that the Opel has 23 l bigger trunk size than the average in the same class. More spacious luggage compartment will be useful during family traveling and also during daily car’s usage.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,142 > 637 l
33

Top speed

180 > 169 km/h
The top speed of the Opel Astra G is greater in comparison to this of the Mazda 3 I which allows to travel the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 11 kilometers per hour is not big and is imperceptible in everyday driving.
8

Engine capacity

1,390 > 1,388 cc
The Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 16V 90HP manual has by 2 cubic centimeters bigger engine size when compared to the Mazda. This may have a little impact as far as acceleration is concerned, as both figures are quite simmilar.
0

Payload

1,624 > 1,623 kg
0

Curb weight

1,163 > 1,153 kg

Cars specifications

Mazda 3 I Hatchback 1.4 i 16V 84HP manual Opel Astra G Hatchback 1.4 16V 90HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2003 1998
    Facelifting no no
    Code name - G
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK