Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual vs Mazda 3 I Hatchback 1.4 i 16V 84HP manual

Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

18 reasons for

Peugeot 307 II Hatchback, model available from 2005 to 2012.
It has 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP diesel engine produced from 2005 to 2008.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Mazda 3 I Hatchback, model available from 2003 to 2009.
It has 1.4 i 16V 84HP petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2009.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mazda 3 I Hatchback 1.4 i 16V 84HP manual
Peugeot

18 reasons for Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90KM manual in comparison to Mazda 3 I Hatchback 1.4 i 16V 84HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

90 > 84 hp
The horsepower of the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback is 6 hp bigger than the Mazda 3 I Hatchback. Because the difference is small this should not affect the car performance extensively.
112

Average consumption

4.9 > 6.9 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Peugeot 307 II Hatchback's advantage. This vehicle uses 29 % less oil in the combined cycle compared to the Mazda. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the compact segment, in which the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback is classified, is 6.8 l while the Peugeot needs by 28 % less fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

6.1 > 8.7 l
The fuel consumption running around the town is considerably to the Peugeot 307 II's advantage. This car burns 2.6 l fewer diesel in built up area in comparison to the Mazda 3 I Hatchback. Better fuel consumption means less fuel cost passed on you.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12.5 > 14.3 s
The Mazda 3 I Hatchback 1.4 i 16V 84HP manual accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h relatively slower than the Peugeot. The difference at the level of 13 % is is slightly to the Peugeot advantage, however, it should not be substantially taken by you into as important when choosing one of compared vehicles.
38

Trunk capacity

338 > 300 l
The trunk of the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback is only 38 liters bigger than the Mazda. However, the difference is not big it would be right to say that both cars have more of less the same trunk capacity.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,326 > 637 l
33

Top speed

179 > 169 km/h
The maximum speed of the ​​Peugeot is greater in relation to the Mazda 3 I by 10 km/h, which allows the Peugeot to cover quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 10 kilometers per hour is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
19

Range

1,224 > 775 km
19

Fuel tank

61 > 55 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback that can carry 11 percent more fuel compared with the Mazda 3 I Hatchback. The average fuel container capacity in the lower middle segment, which is represented by the Peugeot 307 II, equals 52 liters, whereas in C class (represented by the Mazda 3 I Hatchback 1.4 i 16V 84HP manual) it amounts to 52 l.
12

Urban range

984 > 618 km
8

Engine capacity

1,561 > 1,388 cc
The Peugeot 307 II Hatchback has by 173 cubic centimeters larger engine capacity than the Mazda 3 I Hatchback 1.4 i 16V 84HP manual. This play a little role on vehicle's performance, as both figures are quite simmilar.
8

Maximum load capacity

481 > 475 kg
1

Model release date

2005 > 2003
Given that the Mazda started to be manufactured only 2 years earlier than the Peugeot, the distance in technology applied in both vehicles shouldn’t be really big, however, the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual may feature a bit more advanced solutions applied in it.
1

Height

1,522 > 1,465 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Peugeot, which is by 4 % higher than the Mazda 3 I Hatchback 1.4 i 16V 84HP manual, is better choice for you. However, compared cars do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 5,700 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,766 > 1,623 kg
0

End of model sale

2012 > 2009
0

Curb weight

1,293 > 1,153 kg

Mazda

5 reasons for Mazda 3 I Hatchback 1.4 i 16V 84KM manual in comparison to Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual

Reasons for
22

Width

1,755 > 1,740 mm
Distance between two sides of a car directly affects room in the cabin as well as stability during driving. The width of the Mazda 3 I Hatchback 1.4 i 16V 84HP manual is larger by 1 percent in comparison to the Peugeot and is not really relevant. The medium for the „compact” segment equals to 1,703 mm and is by 3 % smaller than the width of the Mazda 3 I Hatchback 1.4 i 16V 84HP manual.
15

Wheelbase

2,641 > 2,610 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Mazda 3 I Hatchback 1.4 i 16V 84HP manual has 31 mm longer wheelbase distance when compared to Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Mazda 3 I should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
6

Length

4,413 > 4,212 mm
The Mazda 3 I Hatchback 1.4 i 16V 84HP manual is 5 % longer than the Peugeot 307 II Hatchback. Long cars are more spacious and in most cases provide bigger trunk. While the Mazda 3 I occurs to be better option for families or those who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance rides, the Peugeot 307 II may appeal to singles because it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,513 > 1,499 mm
0

Front track

1,530 > 1,505 mm

Cars specifications

Peugeot 307 II Hatchback 1.6 HDi 16V 90HP manual Mazda 3 I Hatchback 1.4 i 16V 84HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,364 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2005 2003
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK