Mazda 3 II Hatchback 1.6 MZR 105HP manual vs Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual

Mazda 3 II Hatchback 1.6 MZR 105HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released into the public domain

13 reasons for

Mazda 3 II Hatchback, model available from 2009.
It has 1.6 MZR 105HP petrol engine produced from 2009 to 2011.
Drive has manual gearbox.

6 reasons for

Nissan Tiida Hatchback, model available from 2004.
It has 1.8 i 126HP petrol engine produced from 2004 to 2009.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual
Mazda

13 reasons for Mazda 3 II Hatchback 1.6 MZR 105KM manual in comparison to Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.3 > 7.8 l
The Mazda 3 II Hatchback 1.6 MZR 105HP manual burns up 19 percent less fuel in the mixed cycle when compared to the Nissan Tiida. The Mazda 3 II Hatchback, being classified in „lower middle” segment consumes by 0.5 l less fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle is 6.8 l.
38

Trunk capacity

340 > 300 l
The trunk of the Mazda 3 II Hatchback is only 40 liters bigger than the Nissan Tiida. However, the difference is not big it would be right to say that both vehicles have similar trunk space.
22

Width

1,755 > 1,700 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle influences on room in the cabin and also stability during driving. The width of the Mazda is larger by 55 millimeters in comparison to the Nissan Tiida Hatchback and is not really relevant. The average for the „C” segment is approximately 1,703 millimeters and is by 52 millimeters larger than the same feature of the Mazda 3 II.
19

Range

846 > 667 km
19

Fuel tank

55 > 51 l
The winner of this confrontatnion in the category of fuel tank size is Mazda which is able to take by 4 liters more petrol than the Nissan Tiida Hatchback.
15

Wheelbase

2,633 > 2,604 mm
The Mazda has 29 mm longer wheelbase when compared to Nissan Tiida. Thanks to this the Mazda 3 II is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
8

Maximum load capacity

580 > 503 kg
6

Length

4,460 > 4,294 mm
The Mazda 3 II Hatchback 1.6 MZR 105HP manual is 4 percent longer than the Nissan Tiida. Long cars are more spacious and usually have bigger trunk. While the Mazda 3 II occurs to be better option for families or persons who appreciate comfortable driving, the Nissan Tiida may be more appropriate to singles because it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
1

Model release date

2009 > 2004
Because of the fact that the Nissan Tiida was launched only 5 years prior to the Mazda 3 II Hatchback 1.6 MZR 105HP manual, the gap between technology applied in both vehicles is not really huge, however, the Mazda 3 II Hatchback may feature slightly more modern solutions used in it.
1

Tire width

205 > 195 mm
0

Payload

1,770 > 1,732 kg
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 65 %

Nissan

6 reasons for Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126KM manual in comparison to Mazda 3 II Hatchback 1.6 MZR 105HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

126 > 105 hp
The horsepower of the Nissan is 20 % grater than the Mazda 3 II Hatchback. As the difference is not big it should not affect the car performance largely.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.4 > 12.2 s
A small difference at the level of 1.8 s shows that the Mazda 3 II is the worst vehicle of these two presented. In the „lower middle segment, being represented by the Mazda 3 II Hatchback, the average acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 11.3 s and is by 0.9 s higher than this of Mazda car.
33

Top speed

195 > 184 km/h
The maximum speed of the Nissan is higher as compared to this of the Mazda 3 II Hatchback 1.6 MZR 105HP manual which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 6 percent is small and is imperceptible in everyday driving.
8

Engine capacity

1,798 > 1,598 cc
The Nissan has by 13 % larger engine size in relation to the Mazda. This play a little role when it comes to car's performance, as both figures does not differ much.
1

Height

1,534 > 1,470 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual, which is by 4 % higher than the Mazda 3 II, would be better pick for you. However, compared cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Curb weight

1,232 > 1,185 kg

Cars specifications

Mazda 3 II Hatchback 1.6 MZR 105HP manual Nissan Tiida Hatchback 1.8 i 126HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2009 2004
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
    Payload 1,770 kg 1,732 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK