The Mazda 3 II Hatchback 1.6 MZR 105HP manual burns up 19 percent less fuel in the mixed cycle when compared to the Nissan Tiida. The Mazda 3 II Hatchback, being classified in „lower middle” segment consumes by 0.5 l less fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle is 6.8 l.
The trunk of the Mazda 3 II Hatchback is only 40 liters bigger than the Nissan Tiida. However, the difference is not big it would be right to say that both vehicles have similar trunk space.
Distance between two sides of a vehicle influences on room in the cabin and also stability during driving. The width of the Mazda is larger by 55 millimeters in comparison to the Nissan Tiida Hatchback and is not really relevant. The average for the „C” segment is approximately 1,703 millimeters and is by 52 millimeters larger than the same feature of the Mazda 3 II.
The winner of this confrontatnion in the category of fuel tank size is Mazda which is able to take by 4 liters more petrol than the Nissan Tiida Hatchback.
The Mazda has 29 mm longer wheelbase when compared to Nissan Tiida. Thanks to this the Mazda 3 II is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
Maximum load capacity
The Mazda 3 II Hatchback 1.6 MZR 105HP manual is 4 percent longer than the Nissan Tiida. Long cars are more spacious and usually have bigger trunk. While the Mazda 3 II occurs to be better option for families or persons who appreciate comfortable driving, the Nissan Tiida may be more appropriate to singles because it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
Model release date
Because of the fact that the Nissan Tiida was launched only 5 years prior to the Mazda 3 II Hatchback 1.6 MZR 105HP manual, the gap between technology applied in both vehicles is not really huge, however, the Mazda 3 II Hatchback may feature slightly more modern solutions used in it.